Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Hey cwDickens: It was the "Tale of Two" Halves. "It was the best of times, it was the worse of times." UA played perhaps the best first half of the last couple of season at least. Witnessed what this team is capable of and hopefully WILL become. In the second half, as shot after shot kept missing you could see heads droop lower and lower. Some of the shots were down in the cylinder, some rimmed out, & some were not even close; but no matter what, the ball would not go throw the hoop. Even missed ½ our foul shoots, even though the sample was small (3-6 I think). Went from +2 rebounding in the first half to -13 for the game. I don't really know what to say: it has been YEARS since I read "Tale of Two Cities" ; but recall it had a happy ending. I could be wrong.
  3. Today
  4. Can't really complain about the defense. Can complain about the rebounding. The young guys are going to be inconsistent and they were - Lulka, Rizzuto and Healy combined 6 for 28. A good night by just one guy in that group and we're in the game or winning it at the end. The play I liked last night was when Lauderdale caught the ball in the post, backed Knight down and scored. Then, he didn't get the ball again. Granted, he fouled at an elite level and couldn't stay in the game. I'd like to see him stay on the court and get the ball a little more. If nothing else, I'm enjoying watching Ahmad Clark. He's pretty much doing everything he can this year.
  5. The issues are: no senior leadership, no go to players (at this point), Jackiel and Hyde moments, Mr. Mayhem shows up.

  6. Wins in 2018-19

    godanesgo99 replied to Dane Pound's topic in Winter Sports-Danes Hoops, Track

    I'm still thinking 25 total wins... 2 more in OOC, 19-0 in conference including playoffs and a 1st round tourney win... Gotta stay positive
  7. What's the over/under on how many 3s we shoot? I could see us chucking 30 three-point shots.
  8. There are pieces on this team that keep me encouraged with the understanding that its going to be a down year. What discourages me is that this team has gotten obliterated on the boards the last 4 games. One thing you could usually hang your hat on about an Albany team is that they were going to push you around down low and dominate the boards, or at least be even. I feel the bigs just don't do that much, and they certainly are not banging down low. The guard play has been good, the turnovers have gone down and the games, for the most part, are pretty competitive. Hopefully the bigs progress.

  9. Wins in 2018-19

    Eli replied to Dane Pound's topic in Winter Sports-Danes Hoops, Track

    Yeah I don't think we're going to hit 14-15...unless we start playing last nights first half basketball more consistently (which is possible).
  10. Had 2 for 18. I fell asleep.
  11. As good as they looked in the first half, they looked equally as bad in the second. Still, you can see the building blocks. If they were all upper class men I would be discouraged, but they have time for much improvement. Travis Charles would have been really handy this year. No one seems to be able to step up and hit the mid range jumpers that are usually there.

  12. Wins in 2018-19

    UA_MA_2000 replied to Dane Pound's topic in Winter Sports-Danes Hoops, Track

    Still think around 10 wins or just under is about where we end up. Realtime RPI has us at #347 and finishing at 11-19 (7-9). I'm going 9-21 or 10-18 and somewhere around 6 or 7 wins in league play. http://realtimerpi.com/rpi_100_Men.html
  13. Rough second half to watch. That’s about all that can be said lol
  14. Yeah this isn't going to be a pretty game. I'm hoping for staying within 20 points.
  15. Just caught his 2nd pass of the season vs Browns
  16. Last played PC on 11/14/15. Led with five minutes left, lost 64-60. PC fans said they were impressed by Evan Singletary (18 pts). Don’t think we’ll do as well this time.
  17. So Maine got smoked. Bad year for the CAA.
  18. Last Up: L (61-52) vs Dartmouth Next Up: @ Providence (7-3, average margin of victory is ~10 against super solid competition with close losses to Wichita State and UMass and a blowout loss to Michigan) TV/Streaming: Fox Sports Local Radio: TBD (perhaps 104.5?) Albany had an IMPRESSIVE first half against Dartmouth but then followed up with probably our worst 2nd half of the season. Team is still figuring it out. Providence is going to be a good learning opportunity for this young group. Stats Tracker: UAlbany Wins ** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping ** Opponent Type PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% REB AST STL BLK TO FOUL Canisius OOC 75 66 25 23 47 60 53.2% 38.3% 8 6 18 30 44.4% 20.0% 17 14 25 25 68.0% 56.0% 37 32 17 12 5 11 1 2 18 8 19 24 Oneonta OOC 79 62 30 24 63 62 47.6% 38.7% 7 9 22 24 31.8% 37.5% 12 5 16 8 75.0% 62.5% 45 32 14 16 8 9 2 6 17 19 13 20 Monmouth OOC 82 63 21 24 46 60 45.7% 40.0% 14 5 29 20 48.3% 25.0% 26 10 30 19 86.7% 52.6% 27 40 15 10 7 7 4 1 16 18 19 24 Tot. W 236 191 76 71 156 182 48.7% 39.0% 29 20 69 74 42.0% 27.0% 55 29 71 52 77.5% 55.8% 109 104 46 38 20 27 7 9 51 45 51 68 Avg. W 78.7 63.7 25.3 23.7 52.0 60.7 48.8% 39.0% 9.7 6.7 23.0 24.7 41.5% 27.5% 18.3 9.7 23.7 17.3 76.6% 57.0% 36.3 34.7 15.3 12.7 6.7 9.0 2.3 3.0 17.0 15.0 17.0 22.7 UAlbany Losses ** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping ** Opponent Type PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% REB AST STL BLK TO FOUL Iona OOC 68 72 21 25 58 57 36.2% 43.9% 11 6 24 25 45.8% 24.0% 15 16 16 25 93.8% 64.0% 39 34 10 16 0 12 0 2 22 13 20 16 Boston Univ. OOC 61 71 20 28 59 55 33.9% 50.9% 5 10 20 22 25.0% 45.5% 16 5 22 11 72.7% 45.5% 33 40 14 18 7 3 3 4 8 14 13 21 Holy Cross OOC 65 69 23 26 63 56 36.5% 46.4% 10 5 28 17 35.7% 29.4% 9 12 14 20 64.3% 60.0% 45 32 16 18 5 6 1 7 15 9 22 12 UW-Milwaukee OOC 70 79 23 31 59 53 39.0% 58.5% 10 12 30 21 33.3% 57.1% 14 5 17 7 82.4% 71.4% 28 32 12 19 7 1 2 4 8 12 9 14 LIU Brooklyn OOC 77 80 25 26 56 63 44.6% 41.3% 6 11 22 28 27.3% 39.3% 21 17 27 22 77.8% 77.3% 42 32 10 13 6 10 5 6 26 16 24 21 Dartmouth OOC 77 91 26 30 61 57 42.6% 52.6% 6 17 22 33 27.3% 51.5% 19 14 23 21 82.6% 66.7% 30 37 11 21 8 6 0 4 11 15 16 21 Yale OOC 63 71 23 29 60 54 38.3% 53.7% 8 4 26 14 30.8% 28.6% 9 9 13 22 69.2% 40.9% 32 40 15 19 6 4 1 2 11 13 19 16 Dartmouth OOC 52 61 18 22 60 53 30.0% 41.5% 8 7 24 24 33.3% 29.2% 8 10 14 16 57.1% 62.5% 32 45 7 15 4 1 2 4 5 11 16 18 Tot. L 533 594 179 217 476 448 37.6% 48.4% 64 72 196 184 32.7% 39.1% 111 88 146 144 76.0% 61.1% 281 292 95 139 43 43 14 33 106 103 139 139 Avg. L 66.6 74.3 22.4 27.1 59.5 56.0 37.6% 48.6% 8.0 9.0 24.5 23.0 32.3% 38.1% 13.9 11.0 18.3 18.0 75.0% 61.0% 35.1 36.5 11.9 17.4 5.4 5.4 1.8 4.1 13.3 12.9 17.4 17.4 Tot. (all) 769 785 255 288 632 630 40.3% 45.7% 93 92 265 258 35.1% 35.7% 166 117 217 196 76.5% 59.7% 390 396 141 177 63 70 21 42 157 148 190 207 Avg. (all) 69.9 71.4 23.2 26.2 57.5 57.3 40.7% 46.0% 8.5 8.4 24.1 23.5 34.8% 35.2% 15.1 10.6 19.7 17.8 75.4% 59.9% 35.5 36.0 12.8 16.1 5.7 6.4 1.9 3.8 14.3 13.5 17.3 18.8 PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% REB AST STL BLK TO FOUL
  19. Wow. I didn't realize the rebounding difference was so massive. We got destroyed on the boards. UAlbany Wins ** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping ** Opponent Type PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% REB AST STL BLK TO FOUL Canisius OOC 75 66 25 23 47 60 53.2% 38.3% 8 6 18 30 44.4% 20.0% 17 14 25 25 68.0% 56.0% 37 32 17 12 5 11 1 2 18 8 19 24 Oneonta OOC 79 62 30 24 63 62 47.6% 38.7% 7 9 22 24 31.8% 37.5% 12 5 16 8 75.0% 62.5% 45 32 14 16 8 9 2 6 17 19 13 20 Monmouth OOC 82 63 21 24 46 60 45.7% 40.0% 14 5 29 20 48.3% 25.0% 26 10 30 19 86.7% 52.6% 27 40 15 10 7 7 4 1 16 18 19 24 Tot. W 236 191 76 71 156 182 48.7% 39.0% 29 20 69 74 42.0% 27.0% 55 29 71 52 77.5% 55.8% 109 104 46 38 20 27 7 9 51 45 51 68 Avg. W 78.7 63.7 25.3 23.7 52.0 60.7 48.8% 39.0% 9.7 6.7 23.0 24.7 41.5% 27.5% 18.3 9.7 23.7 17.3 76.6% 57.0% 36.3 34.7 15.3 12.7 6.7 9.0 2.3 3.0 17.0 15.0 17.0 22.7 UAlbany Losses ** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping ** Opponent Type PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% REB AST STL BLK TO FOUL Iona OOC 68 72 21 25 58 57 36.2% 43.9% 11 6 24 25 45.8% 24.0% 15 16 16 25 93.8% 64.0% 39 34 10 16 0 12 0 2 22 13 20 16 Boston Univ. OOC 61 71 20 28 59 55 33.9% 50.9% 5 10 20 22 25.0% 45.5% 16 5 22 11 72.7% 45.5% 33 40 14 18 7 3 3 4 8 14 13 21 Holy Cross OOC 65 69 23 26 63 56 36.5% 46.4% 10 5 28 17 35.7% 29.4% 9 12 14 20 64.3% 60.0% 45 32 16 18 5 6 1 7 15 9 22 12 UW-Milwaukee OOC 70 79 23 31 59 53 39.0% 58.5% 10 12 30 21 33.3% 57.1% 14 5 17 7 82.4% 71.4% 28 32 12 19 7 1 2 4 8 12 9 14 LIU Brooklyn OOC 77 80 25 26 56 63 44.6% 41.3% 6 11 22 28 27.3% 39.3% 21 17 27 22 77.8% 77.3% 42 32 10 13 6 10 5 6 26 16 24 21 Dartmouth OOC 77 91 26 30 61 57 42.6% 52.6% 6 17 22 33 27.3% 51.5% 19 14 23 21 82.6% 66.7% 30 37 11 21 8 6 0 4 11 15 16 21 Yale OOC 63 71 23 29 60 54 38.3% 53.7% 8 4 26 14 30.8% 28.6% 9 9 13 22 69.2% 40.9% 32 40 15 19 6 4 1 2 11 13 19 16 Dartmouth OOC 52 61 18 22 60 53 30.0% 41.5% 8 7 24 24 33.3% 29.2% 8 10 14 16 57.1% 62.5% 32 45 7 15 4 1 2 4 5 11 16 18 Tot. L 533 594 179 217 476 448 37.6% 48.4% 64 72 196 184 32.7% 39.1% 111 88 146 144 76.0% 61.1% 281 292 95 139 43 43 14 33 106 103 139 139 Avg. L 66.6 74.3 22.4 27.1 59.5 56.0 37.6% 48.6% 8.0 9.0 24.5 23.0 32.3% 38.1% 13.9 11.0 18.3 18.0 75.0% 61.0% 35.1 36.5 11.9 17.4 5.4 5.4 1.8 4.1 13.3 12.9 17.4 17.4 Tot. (all) 769 785 255 288 632 630 40.3% 45.7% 93 92 265 258 35.1% 35.7% 166 117 217 196 76.5% 59.7% 390 396 141 177 63 70 21 42 157 148 190 207 Avg. (all) 69.9 71.4 23.2 26.2 57.5 57.3 40.7% 46.0% 8.5 8.4 24.1 23.5 34.8% 35.2% 15.1 10.6 19.7 17.8 75.4% 59.9% 35.5 36.0 12.8 16.1 5.7 6.4 1.9 3.8 14.3 13.5 17.3 18.8 PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% REB AST STL BLK TO FOUL
  20. I too think this team could gel just in time for the AE tourney and make some noise. We have the tools, just need to figure out how to use them. That take a little more time. I'm not upset at all with any loss so far this season.
  21. I truly hope so . I really do. My point Is this .. how much better are then we now then we were during the canisius game ??? Not much . We will def continue to improve but will need to improve at a much much more rapid pace than we r now.

  22. Ahmad Clark

    godanesgo99 replied to godanesgo99's topic in Winter Sports-Danes Hoops, Track

    I was referencing the not getting off the bench in high school part but working hard when unsaid inspirational BTW.
  23. Last year we smoked the ooc schedule and then flopped like a beached whale. Then the two ‘stars’ fled. Maybe this year will be the exact time opposite. We could get a first round win in the tourney depending on our seeding. But not a 2nd round. As it looks right now.
  24. BTW I'm not saying this is a 20 win team... They aren't even close but I think they will continue to get better even if they win 11 or 12 games this season... By tourney they should be better then now and I think will he a tough out. They do have a long way to go.
  25. Yesterday
  26. Let's see how it plays out... If they are a stock... I'M BUYING!
  27. Bottom half record wise, first round loss in the AE tourney. I really hope I'm wrong but I just think they need a lot more time to get experience and get better. I know the conference is not that good but I just don't see a huge improvement coming in the next month. I would never mock anyone for thinking anything about what the rest of the season will bring. I just don't see and as I said, I REALLY hope I'm wrong. Do I think this team will be very good next year? If we don't lose a lot of players, YES, very good. A full year for freshman and jucos.
  28. I truly hope so. But after what I have seen in the first 11 games . I will mock away . Haha .. would need massive and I mean massive improvements.
  1. Load more activity
×