Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

[MBB] Game #29: 2/18/18 - 1:00pm - @ UMBC


Eli

Recommended Posts

Its these incredibly long stretches of nothing that I cant figure out. We can blame the D. We can blame a missed FT, but we made one baske in the last 7:53 of this game (if Im reading it right).

You have to trust your junior captain to not to pick up his last foul with 7+ min left in the most important conference game of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it seems like I'm being negative but some major observations and I challenge anyone to debate this:

 

Cremo is a great players but has missed SEVERAL, SEVERAL big free throws throughout his career. I can name 4 games.

 

Campbell,unless major improvement, should play about 8 to 10 minutes next year.

 

This team does not get BIG/NEEDED defensive stops when it counts. Seems like never.

 

Bottom line is this is an extremely underachieving team. Extremely disappointing. The AE is terrible.

 

Can't win if you don't score, the shooting was painful to watch down the stretch. Starters didn't have it today other than Cremo in the 1H. Three bench points for the whole game, none in the second half. Few teams in the country are good enough to win with how bad our offense was down to close this one out. Our defense is what it is, not great but good enough most of the time...very confusing when the offense disappears the way it did in this one and late in some other games.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach on post game said Joe was sick (did not elaborate) @ 1/2 time and entire second 1/2. Said we missed a lot of wide open shots, sign of tired legs. Said umbc had a week off before this game while UA has played 3 straight on the road.

 

 

It sounds like an excuse but that was apparent down the stretch. UMBC was fresh and we faded. It didn't help that against Lowell we didn't put the hammer down and rest our starters but had to battle until the end.

 

Coming into this year with the number of guys we were bringing back it looked like we "only" had to replace the production of Dallas and Mike Rowely. 29 games in it's apparent we haven't done that. Other than shot blocking with Foster, we're more or less the same team we were last year and are going to end up with more or less the same regular season result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Coach on post game said Joe was sick (did not elaborate) @ 1/2 time and entire second 1/2. Said we missed a lot of wide open shots, sign of tired legs. Said umbc had a week off before this game while UA has played 3 straight on the road.

 

It sounds like an excuse but that was apparent down the stretch. UMBC was fresh and we faded. It didn't help that against Lowell we didn't put the hammer down and rest our starters but had to battle until the end.

 

Coming into this year with the number of guys we were bringing back it looked like we "only" had to replace the production of Dallas and Mike Rowely. 29 games in it's apparent we haven't done that. Other than shot blocking with Foster, we're more or less the same team we were last year and are going to end up with more or less the same regular season result.

This bench is about as terrible as any I can remember... None of them can do anything. Really shallow team leaving almost no room for error for the starters.

 

If one of them doesn't play well... Very difficult to win as there is no one to slot in behind them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got done watching the game...

 

Campbell has played excellence defense today. But he is just such a liability of offense. It really hurts spacing.

 

Gonna have to disagree. He was on Lyles most of the game and Lyles put up big numbers. Granted Lyles beat Joe a few times too, but Campbell was on him probably 60% of the game if not 75%.

 

And he can't buy a bucket to save his life...that wide open 3 at the end of the 2nd half couldn't be more wide open. He promptly bricked it.

#ReturnTheScholarship #HitTheRoadJaErmDevonte

 

I asked the wife during the game when were up 12 if we made it to the title round in Burlington again if she'd like to attend (we did last year). That was premature on my part. This team won't make it to the championship round. Might not even make it to the semifinals. I just don't see how. We'll be lucky to make it out of the first round with these types of mental lapses (we had like 4 TO's in a row at one point).

Waste of a season...Joe and David have yet to win a championship. We're in a dry spell now. UVM is basically a lock to win it all.

UAlbany Wins																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Iona		OOC	69	67	24	26	62	59	38.7%	44.1%	4	4	15	22	26.7%	18.2%	17	11	19	14	89.5%	78.6%	47	27	6	14	1	6	0	3	13	7	16	21
Boston U	OOC	88	74	32	29	56	65	57.1%	44.6%	3	8	5	27	60.0%	29.6%	21	8	29	11	72.4%	72.7%	38	27	11	13	2	7	1	4	11	7	15	21
Yale		OOC	80	72	32	28	59	67	54.2%	41.8%	3	7	14	28	21.4%	25.0%	13	9	19	13	68.4%	69.2%	40	30	16	10	4	6	3	5	15	13	15	17
Oneonta		OOC	102	77	37	23	72	57	51.4%	40.4%	7	10	21	25	33.3%	40.0%	21	21	28	28	75.0%	75.0%	48	31	17	13	4	3	0	3	7	14	24	28
Dartmouth	OOC	91	73	34	27	64	49	53.1%	55.1%	8	8	17	17	47.1%	47.1%	15	11	16	12	93.8%	91.7%	28	25	13	11	8	5	0	7	12	20	13	19
Holy Cross	OOC	78	62	31	24	58	48	53.4%	50.0%	10	5	21	18	47.6%	27.8%	6	9	10	14	60.0%	64.3%	32	23	18	11	5	3	1	4	7	9	15	14
Colgate		OOC	75	69	25	25	59	55	42.4%	45.5%	6	8	18	22	33.3%	36.4%	19	11	23	16	82.6%	68.8%	39	24	14	9	7	7	1	1	11	9	15	20
Columbia	OOC	86	82	28	31	62	61	45.2%	50.8%	6	9	13	20	46.2%	45.0%	24	11	29	18	82.8%	61.1%	37	36	13	19	11	3	1	3	9	16	15	25
Bryant		OOC	84	68	33	24	61	61	54.1%	39.3%	9	11	17	26	52.9%	42.3%	9	9	13	16	69.2%	56.3%	40	27	21	21	2	10	2	4	14	9	14	16
Siena		OOC	74	69	26	24	55	50	47.3%	48.0%	5	9	15	20	33.3%	45.0%	17	12	25	17	68.0%	70.6%	30	27	11	10	8	5	1	3	12	16	15	22
Canisius	OOC	68	65	26	28	53	61	49.1%	45.9%	2	6	10	22	20.0%	27.3%	14	3	20	7	70.0%	42.9%	33	29	11	19	2	8	3	1	12	10	11	20
Kent State	OOC	78	68	23	28	46	68	50.0%	41.2%	7	3	18	20	38.9%	15.0%	25	9	32	13	78.1%	69.2%	32	35	20	13	4	4	4	2	11	11	18	25
Stony Brook	AE	78	65	29	25	55	60	52.7%	41.7%	6	10	9	20	66.7%	50.0%	14	5	17	8	82.4%	62.5%	37	28	20	17	2	5	8	5	11	9	11	18
Maine		AE	84	66	21	21	58	56	36.2%	37.5%	7	6	17	22	41.2%	27.3%	35	18	44	27	79.5%	66.7%	43	38	13	14	3	4	6	4	9	12	23	32
UMass-Lowell	AE	70	62	24	25	52	54	46.2%	46.3%	3	7	12	21	25.0%	33.3%	19	5	22	8	86.4%	62.5%	32	29	15	19	10	6	5	3	14	18	14	19
UMBC		AE	83	39	33	17	57	54	57.9%	31.5%	9	2	17	20	52.9%	10.0%	8	3	10	7	80.0%	42.9%	40	23	20	12	8	6	2	4	12	15	14	14
Stony Brook	AE	57	50	18	21	50	57	36.0%	36.8%	4	6	13	22	30.8%	27.3%	17	2	21	5	81.0%	40.0%	41	32	7	6	5	6	3	4	15	13	17	22
New Hampshire	AE	83	74	25	27	48	56	52.1%	48.2%	8	6	17	25	47.1%	24.0%	25	14	33	21	75.8%	66.7%	29	29	13	19	1	3	2	2	8	8	17	23
Hartford	AE	69	63	21	24	48	56	43.8%	42.9%	6	4	16	18	37.5%	22.2%	21	11	32	15	65.6%	73.3%	36	28	9	9	4	7	3	2	10	10	17	24
UMass-Lowell	AE	91	81	34	33	57	60	59.6%	55.0%	10	7	17	21	58.8%	33.3%	13	8	16	15	81.3%	53.3%	32	26	11	16	5	9	4	2	16	12	18	14
																																	
Tot. W		OOC	973	846	351	317	707	701	49.6%	45.2%	70	88	184	267	38.0%	33.0%	201	124	263	179	76.4%	69.3%	444	341	171	163	58	67	17	40	134	141	186	248
		AE	615	500	205	193	425	453	48.2%	42.6%	53	48	118	169	44.9%	28.4%	152	66	195	106	77.9%	62.3%	290	233	108	112	38	46	33	26	95	97	131	166
																																	
Avg. W		OOC	81.1	70.5	29.3	26.4	58.9	58.4	49.6%	45.2%	5.8	7.3	15.3	22.3	38.0%	33.0%	16.8	10.3	21.9	14.9	76.4%	69.3%	37.0	28.4	14.3	13.6	4.8	5.6	1.4	3.3	11.2	11.8	15.5	20.7
		AE	76.9	62.5	25.6	24.1	53.1	56.6	48.2%	42.6%	6.6	6.0	14.8	21.1	44.9%	28.4%	19.0	8.3	24.4	13.3	77.9%	62.3%	36.3	29.1	13.5	14.0	4.8	5.8	4.1	3.3	11.9	12.1	16.4	20.8
																																	
Tot. W			1588	1346	556	510	1132	1154	49.1%	44.2%	123	136	302	436	40.7%	31.2%	353	190	458	285	77.1%	66.7%	734	574	279	275	96	113	50	66	229	238	317	414
Avg. W			79.4	67.3	27.8	25.5	56.6	57.7	49.0%	44.3%	6.2	6.8	15.1	21.8	41.0%	31.3%	17.7	9.5	22.9	14.3	77.1%	64.4%	36.7	28.7	14.0	13.8	4.8	5.7	2.5	3.3	11.5	11.9	15.9	20.7
																																	
UAlbany Losses																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Monmouth	OOC	73	81	26	28	54	56	48.1%	50.0%	3	8	11	18	27.3%	44.4%	18	17	28	24	64.3%	70.8%	41	29	5	12	2	7	3	4	15	8	23	24
Memphis		OOC	58	67	21	23	61	49	34.4%	46.9%	4	4	17	17	23.5%	23.5%	12	17	15	24	80.0%	70.8%	38	33	8	10	4	7	2	11	14	12	18	16
Louisville	OOC	68	70	27	24	74	57	36.5%	42.1%	6	9	20	21	30.0%	42.9%	8	13	12	21	66.7%	61.9%	52	37	9	11	2	4	2	10	10	7	19	19
Hartford	AE	64	72	23	25	54	50	42.6%	50.0%	8	9	19	18	42.1%	50.0%	10	13	14	13	71.4%	100.0%	28	30	14	15	7	8	3	9	12	14	16	18
New Hampshire	AE	61	64	20	25	49	62	40.8%	40.3%	4	10	14	24	28.6%	41.7%	17	4	27	6	63.0%	66.7%	34	41	10	13	4	4	2	0	10	10	16	22
Binghamton	AE	66	79	24	24	59	52	40.7%	46.2%	5	6	16	16	31.3%	37.5%	13	25	16	32	81.3%	78.1%	33	35	9	12	4	4	2	4	12	10	22	15
Vermont		AE	50	61	20	22	51	51	39.2%	43.1%	1	6	11	16	9.1%	37.5%	9	11	12	16	75.0%	68.8%	30	35	3	9	2	3	6	6	11	10	17	14
Vermont		AE	67	72	27	24	61	52	44.3%	46.2%	5	4	15	12	33.3%	33.3%	8	20	11	20	72.7%	100.0%	33	30	19	15	4	0	3	4	6	8	19	14
UMBC		AE	60	68	22	24	58	49	37.9%	49.0%	8	7	23	18	34.8%	38.9%	8	13	9	15	88.9%	86.7%	37	25	9	15	3	6	2	2	15	11	15	15
																																	
Tot. L		OOC	199	218	74	75	189	162	39.2%	46.3%	13	21	48	56	27.1%	37.5%	38	47	55	69	69.1%	68.1%	131	99	22	33	8	18	7	25	39	27	60	59
		AE	368	416	136	144	332	316	41.0%	45.6%	31	42	98	104	31.6%	40.4%	65	86	89	102	73.0%	84.3%	195	196	64	79	24	25	18	25	66	63	105	98
																																	
Avg. L		OOC	66.3	72.7	24.7	25.0	63.0	54.0	39.2%	46.3%	4.3	7.0	16.0	18.7	27.1%	37.5%	12.7	15.7	18.3	23.0	69.1%	68.1%	43.7	33.0	7.3	11.0	2.7	6.0	2.3	8.3	13.0	9.0	20.0	19.7
		AE	61.3	69.3	22.7	24.0	55.3	52.7	41.0%	45.6%	5.2	7.0	16.3	17.3	31.6%	40.4%	10.8	14.3	14.8	17.0	73.0%	84.3%	32.5	32.7	10.7	13.2	4.0	4.2	3.0	4.2	11.0	10.5	17.5	16.3
																																	
Tot. L			567	634	210	219	521	478	40.3%	45.8%	44	63	146	160	30.1%	39.4%	103	133	144	171	71.5%	77.8%	326	295	86	112	32	43	25	50	105	90	165	157
Avg. L			63.0	70.4	23.3	24.3	57.9	53.1	40.5%	46.0%	4.9	7.0	16.2	17.8	28.9%	38.9%	11.4	14.8	16.0	19.0	73.7%	78.2%	36.2	32.8	9.6	12.4	3.6	4.8	2.8	5.6	11.7	10.0	18.3	17.4
																																	
Tot. (all)		2155	1980	766	729	1653	1632	46.3%	44.7%	167	199	448	596	37.3%	33.4%	456	323	602	456	75.7%	70.8%	1060	869	365	387	128	156	75	116	334	328	482	571
Avg. (all)		74.3	68.3	26.4	25.1	57.0	56.3	46.4%	44.8%	5.8	6.9	15.4	20.6	37.3%	33.6%	15.7	11.1	20.8	15.7	76.0%	68.7%	36.6	30.0	12.6	13.3	4.4	5.4	2.6	4.0	11.5	11.3	16.6	19.7
			PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Coach on post game said Joe was sick (did not elaborate) @ 1/2 time and entire second 1/2. Said we missed a lot of wide open shots, sign of tired legs. Said umbc had a week off before this game while UA has played 3 straight on the road.

 

It sounds like an excuse but that was apparent down the stretch. UMBC was fresh and we faded. It didn't help that against Lowell we didn't put the hammer down and rest our starters but had to battle until the end.

 

Coming into this year with the number of guys we were bringing back it looked like we "only" had to replace the production of Dallas and Mike Rowely. 29 games in it's apparent we haven't done that. Other than shot blocking with Foster, we're more or less the same team we were last year and are going to end up with more or less the same regular season result.

This bench is about as terrible as any I can remember... None of them can do anything. Really shallow team leaving almost no room for error for the starters.

 

If one of them doesn't play well... Very difficult to win as there is no one to slot in behind them.

 

 

The bench is a disaster. Completely unreliable. Might as well just play the starters 40 minutes if possible.

 

On paper this looked like a super impressive schedule...and a super deep team to go toe-to-toe with Vermont's deep team. Neither of those things were true.

 

Can't wait to see Lulka, Hank and Healy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just got done watching the game...

 

 

Campbell has played excellence defense today. But he is just such a liability of offense. It really hurts spacing.

Gonna have to disagree. He was on Lyles most of the game and Lyles put up big numbers. Granted Lyles beat Joe a few times too, but Campbell was on him probably 60% of the game if not 75%.

 

And he can't buy a bucket to save his life...that wide open 3 at the end of the 2nd half couldn't be more wide open. He promptly bricked it.

#ReturnTheScholarship #HitTheRoadJaErmDevonte

 

I asked the wife during the game when were up 12 if we made it to the title round in Burlington again if she'd like to attend (we did last year). That was premature on my part. This team won't make it to the championship round. Might not even make it to the semifinals. I just don't see how. We'll be lucky to make it out of the first round with these types of mental lapses (we had like 4 TO's in a row at one point).

 

Waste of a season...Joe and David have yet to win a championship. We're in a dry spell now. UVM is basically a lock to win it all.

UAlbany Wins																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Iona		OOC	69	67	24	26	62	59	38.7%	44.1%	4	4	15	22	26.7%	18.2%	17	11	19	14	89.5%	78.6%	47	27	6	14	1	6	0	3	13	7	16	21
Boston U	OOC	88	74	32	29	56	65	57.1%	44.6%	3	8	5	27	60.0%	29.6%	21	8	29	11	72.4%	72.7%	38	27	11	13	2	7	1	4	11	7	15	21
Yale		OOC	80	72	32	28	59	67	54.2%	41.8%	3	7	14	28	21.4%	25.0%	13	9	19	13	68.4%	69.2%	40	30	16	10	4	6	3	5	15	13	15	17
Oneonta		OOC	102	77	37	23	72	57	51.4%	40.4%	7	10	21	25	33.3%	40.0%	21	21	28	28	75.0%	75.0%	48	31	17	13	4	3	0	3	7	14	24	28
Dartmouth	OOC	91	73	34	27	64	49	53.1%	55.1%	8	8	17	17	47.1%	47.1%	15	11	16	12	93.8%	91.7%	28	25	13	11	8	5	0	7	12	20	13	19
Holy Cross	OOC	78	62	31	24	58	48	53.4%	50.0%	10	5	21	18	47.6%	27.8%	6	9	10	14	60.0%	64.3%	32	23	18	11	5	3	1	4	7	9	15	14
Colgate		OOC	75	69	25	25	59	55	42.4%	45.5%	6	8	18	22	33.3%	36.4%	19	11	23	16	82.6%	68.8%	39	24	14	9	7	7	1	1	11	9	15	20
Columbia	OOC	86	82	28	31	62	61	45.2%	50.8%	6	9	13	20	46.2%	45.0%	24	11	29	18	82.8%	61.1%	37	36	13	19	11	3	1	3	9	16	15	25
Bryant		OOC	84	68	33	24	61	61	54.1%	39.3%	9	11	17	26	52.9%	42.3%	9	9	13	16	69.2%	56.3%	40	27	21	21	2	10	2	4	14	9	14	16
Siena		OOC	74	69	26	24	55	50	47.3%	48.0%	5	9	15	20	33.3%	45.0%	17	12	25	17	68.0%	70.6%	30	27	11	10	8	5	1	3	12	16	15	22
Canisius	OOC	68	65	26	28	53	61	49.1%	45.9%	2	6	10	22	20.0%	27.3%	14	3	20	7	70.0%	42.9%	33	29	11	19	2	8	3	1	12	10	11	20
Kent State	OOC	78	68	23	28	46	68	50.0%	41.2%	7	3	18	20	38.9%	15.0%	25	9	32	13	78.1%	69.2%	32	35	20	13	4	4	4	2	11	11	18	25
Stony Brook	AE	78	65	29	25	55	60	52.7%	41.7%	6	10	9	20	66.7%	50.0%	14	5	17	8	82.4%	62.5%	37	28	20	17	2	5	8	5	11	9	11	18
Maine		AE	84	66	21	21	58	56	36.2%	37.5%	7	6	17	22	41.2%	27.3%	35	18	44	27	79.5%	66.7%	43	38	13	14	3	4	6	4	9	12	23	32
UMass-Lowell	AE	70	62	24	25	52	54	46.2%	46.3%	3	7	12	21	25.0%	33.3%	19	5	22	8	86.4%	62.5%	32	29	15	19	10	6	5	3	14	18	14	19
UMBC		AE	83	39	33	17	57	54	57.9%	31.5%	9	2	17	20	52.9%	10.0%	8	3	10	7	80.0%	42.9%	40	23	20	12	8	6	2	4	12	15	14	14
Stony Brook	AE	57	50	18	21	50	57	36.0%	36.8%	4	6	13	22	30.8%	27.3%	17	2	21	5	81.0%	40.0%	41	32	7	6	5	6	3	4	15	13	17	22
New Hampshire	AE	83	74	25	27	48	56	52.1%	48.2%	8	6	17	25	47.1%	24.0%	25	14	33	21	75.8%	66.7%	29	29	13	19	1	3	2	2	8	8	17	23
Hartford	AE	69	63	21	24	48	56	43.8%	42.9%	6	4	16	18	37.5%	22.2%	21	11	32	15	65.6%	73.3%	36	28	9	9	4	7	3	2	10	10	17	24
UMass-Lowell	AE	91	81	34	33	57	60	59.6%	55.0%	10	7	17	21	58.8%	33.3%	13	8	16	15	81.3%	53.3%	32	26	11	16	5	9	4	2	16	12	18	14
																																	
Tot. W		OOC	973	846	351	317	707	701	49.6%	45.2%	70	88	184	267	38.0%	33.0%	201	124	263	179	76.4%	69.3%	444	341	171	163	58	67	17	40	134	141	186	248
		AE	615	500	205	193	425	453	48.2%	42.6%	53	48	118	169	44.9%	28.4%	152	66	195	106	77.9%	62.3%	290	233	108	112	38	46	33	26	95	97	131	166
																																	
Avg. W		OOC	81.1	70.5	29.3	26.4	58.9	58.4	49.6%	45.2%	5.8	7.3	15.3	22.3	38.0%	33.0%	16.8	10.3	21.9	14.9	76.4%	69.3%	37.0	28.4	14.3	13.6	4.8	5.6	1.4	3.3	11.2	11.8	15.5	20.7
		AE	76.9	62.5	25.6	24.1	53.1	56.6	48.2%	42.6%	6.6	6.0	14.8	21.1	44.9%	28.4%	19.0	8.3	24.4	13.3	77.9%	62.3%	36.3	29.1	13.5	14.0	4.8	5.8	4.1	3.3	11.9	12.1	16.4	20.8
																																	
Tot. W			1588	1346	556	510	1132	1154	49.1%	44.2%	123	136	302	436	40.7%	31.2%	353	190	458	285	77.1%	66.7%	734	574	279	275	96	113	50	66	229	238	317	414
Avg. W			79.4	67.3	27.8	25.5	56.6	57.7	49.0%	44.3%	6.2	6.8	15.1	21.8	41.0%	31.3%	17.7	9.5	22.9	14.3	77.1%	64.4%	36.7	28.7	14.0	13.8	4.8	5.7	2.5	3.3	11.5	11.9	15.9	20.7
																																	
UAlbany Losses																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Monmouth	OOC	73	81	26	28	54	56	48.1%	50.0%	3	8	11	18	27.3%	44.4%	18	17	28	24	64.3%	70.8%	41	29	5	12	2	7	3	4	15	8	23	24
Memphis		OOC	58	67	21	23	61	49	34.4%	46.9%	4	4	17	17	23.5%	23.5%	12	17	15	24	80.0%	70.8%	38	33	8	10	4	7	2	11	14	12	18	16
Louisville	OOC	68	70	27	24	74	57	36.5%	42.1%	6	9	20	21	30.0%	42.9%	8	13	12	21	66.7%	61.9%	52	37	9	11	2	4	2	10	10	7	19	19
Hartford	AE	64	72	23	25	54	50	42.6%	50.0%	8	9	19	18	42.1%	50.0%	10	13	14	13	71.4%	100.0%	28	30	14	15	7	8	3	9	12	14	16	18
New Hampshire	AE	61	64	20	25	49	62	40.8%	40.3%	4	10	14	24	28.6%	41.7%	17	4	27	6	63.0%	66.7%	34	41	10	13	4	4	2	0	10	10	16	22
Binghamton	AE	66	79	24	24	59	52	40.7%	46.2%	5	6	16	16	31.3%	37.5%	13	25	16	32	81.3%	78.1%	33	35	9	12	4	4	2	4	12	10	22	15
Vermont		AE	50	61	20	22	51	51	39.2%	43.1%	1	6	11	16	9.1%	37.5%	9	11	12	16	75.0%	68.8%	30	35	3	9	2	3	6	6	11	10	17	14
Vermont		AE	67	72	27	24	61	52	44.3%	46.2%	5	4	15	12	33.3%	33.3%	8	20	11	20	72.7%	100.0%	33	30	19	15	4	0	3	4	6	8	19	14
UMBC		AE	60	68	22	24	58	49	37.9%	49.0%	8	7	23	18	34.8%	38.9%	8	13	9	15	88.9%	86.7%	37	25	9	15	3	6	2	2	15	11	15	15
																																	
Tot. L		OOC	199	218	74	75	189	162	39.2%	46.3%	13	21	48	56	27.1%	37.5%	38	47	55	69	69.1%	68.1%	131	99	22	33	8	18	7	25	39	27	60	59
		AE	368	416	136	144	332	316	41.0%	45.6%	31	42	98	104	31.6%	40.4%	65	86	89	102	73.0%	84.3%	195	196	64	79	24	25	18	25	66	63	105	98
																																	
Avg. L		OOC	66.3	72.7	24.7	25.0	63.0	54.0	39.2%	46.3%	4.3	7.0	16.0	18.7	27.1%	37.5%	12.7	15.7	18.3	23.0	69.1%	68.1%	43.7	33.0	7.3	11.0	2.7	6.0	2.3	8.3	13.0	9.0	20.0	19.7
		AE	61.3	69.3	22.7	24.0	55.3	52.7	41.0%	45.6%	5.2	7.0	16.3	17.3	31.6%	40.4%	10.8	14.3	14.8	17.0	73.0%	84.3%	32.5	32.7	10.7	13.2	4.0	4.2	3.0	4.2	11.0	10.5	17.5	16.3
																																	
Tot. L			567	634	210	219	521	478	40.3%	45.8%	44	63	146	160	30.1%	39.4%	103	133	144	171	71.5%	77.8%	326	295	86	112	32	43	25	50	105	90	165	157
Avg. L			63.0	70.4	23.3	24.3	57.9	53.1	40.5%	46.0%	4.9	7.0	16.2	17.8	28.9%	38.9%	11.4	14.8	16.0	19.0	73.7%	78.2%	36.2	32.8	9.6	12.4	3.6	4.8	2.8	5.6	11.7	10.0	18.3	17.4
																																	
Tot. (all)		2155	1980	766	729	1653	1632	46.3%	44.7%	167	199	448	596	37.3%	33.4%	456	323	602	456	75.7%	70.8%	1060	869	365	387	128	156	75	116	334	328	482	571
Avg. (all)		74.3	68.3	26.4	25.1	57.0	56.3	46.4%	44.8%	5.8	6.9	15.4	20.6	37.3%	33.6%	15.7	11.1	20.8	15.7	76.0%	68.7%	36.6	30.0	12.6	13.3	4.4	5.4	2.6	4.0	11.5	11.3	16.6	19.7
			PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	

To be completely honest you are 100 percent right. I was just trying not to make my 10th consecutive negative post for the game . Haha.

 

Campbell has been terrible, however like Click has said b4 we have nobody to replace him .

 

I will post this is more detail after the season however we lose Stire, Foster, and Charles. Click say Lulka will be a beast but he will only be a freshman . If I'm will Brown am I going to waste Cremos and Nichols Sr years? U may think I'm crazy but if I'm Brown I may bring in 2 5th year Srs unless I can get a can't miss JUCO player. Season not over , just food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just got done watching the game...

 

Campbell has played excellence defense today. But he is just such a liability of offense. It really hurts spacing.

Gonna have to disagree. He was on Lyles most of the game and Lyles put up big numbers. Granted Lyles beat Joe a few times too, but Campbell was on him probably 60% of the game if not 75%.

 

And he can't buy a bucket to save his life...that wide open 3 at the end of the 2nd half couldn't be more wide open. He promptly bricked it.

#ReturnTheScholarship #HitTheRoadJaErmDevonte

 

I asked the wife during the game when were up 12 if we made it to the title round in Burlington again if she'd like to attend (we did last year). That was premature on my part. This team won't make it to the championship round. Might not even make it to the semifinals. I just don't see how. We'll be lucky to make it out of the first round with these types of mental lapses (we had like 4 TO's in a row at one point).

 

Waste of a season...Joe and David have yet to win a championship. We're in a dry spell now. UVM is basically a lock to win it all.

UAlbany Wins																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Iona		OOC	69	67	24	26	62	59	38.7%	44.1%	4	4	15	22	26.7%	18.2%	17	11	19	14	89.5%	78.6%	47	27	6	14	1	6	0	3	13	7	16	21
Boston U	OOC	88	74	32	29	56	65	57.1%	44.6%	3	8	5	27	60.0%	29.6%	21	8	29	11	72.4%	72.7%	38	27	11	13	2	7	1	4	11	7	15	21
Yale		OOC	80	72	32	28	59	67	54.2%	41.8%	3	7	14	28	21.4%	25.0%	13	9	19	13	68.4%	69.2%	40	30	16	10	4	6	3	5	15	13	15	17
Oneonta		OOC	102	77	37	23	72	57	51.4%	40.4%	7	10	21	25	33.3%	40.0%	21	21	28	28	75.0%	75.0%	48	31	17	13	4	3	0	3	7	14	24	28
Dartmouth	OOC	91	73	34	27	64	49	53.1%	55.1%	8	8	17	17	47.1%	47.1%	15	11	16	12	93.8%	91.7%	28	25	13	11	8	5	0	7	12	20	13	19
Holy Cross	OOC	78	62	31	24	58	48	53.4%	50.0%	10	5	21	18	47.6%	27.8%	6	9	10	14	60.0%	64.3%	32	23	18	11	5	3	1	4	7	9	15	14
Colgate		OOC	75	69	25	25	59	55	42.4%	45.5%	6	8	18	22	33.3%	36.4%	19	11	23	16	82.6%	68.8%	39	24	14	9	7	7	1	1	11	9	15	20
Columbia	OOC	86	82	28	31	62	61	45.2%	50.8%	6	9	13	20	46.2%	45.0%	24	11	29	18	82.8%	61.1%	37	36	13	19	11	3	1	3	9	16	15	25
Bryant		OOC	84	68	33	24	61	61	54.1%	39.3%	9	11	17	26	52.9%	42.3%	9	9	13	16	69.2%	56.3%	40	27	21	21	2	10	2	4	14	9	14	16
Siena		OOC	74	69	26	24	55	50	47.3%	48.0%	5	9	15	20	33.3%	45.0%	17	12	25	17	68.0%	70.6%	30	27	11	10	8	5	1	3	12	16	15	22
Canisius	OOC	68	65	26	28	53	61	49.1%	45.9%	2	6	10	22	20.0%	27.3%	14	3	20	7	70.0%	42.9%	33	29	11	19	2	8	3	1	12	10	11	20
Kent State	OOC	78	68	23	28	46	68	50.0%	41.2%	7	3	18	20	38.9%	15.0%	25	9	32	13	78.1%	69.2%	32	35	20	13	4	4	4	2	11	11	18	25
Stony Brook	AE	78	65	29	25	55	60	52.7%	41.7%	6	10	9	20	66.7%	50.0%	14	5	17	8	82.4%	62.5%	37	28	20	17	2	5	8	5	11	9	11	18
Maine		AE	84	66	21	21	58	56	36.2%	37.5%	7	6	17	22	41.2%	27.3%	35	18	44	27	79.5%	66.7%	43	38	13	14	3	4	6	4	9	12	23	32
UMass-Lowell	AE	70	62	24	25	52	54	46.2%	46.3%	3	7	12	21	25.0%	33.3%	19	5	22	8	86.4%	62.5%	32	29	15	19	10	6	5	3	14	18	14	19
UMBC		AE	83	39	33	17	57	54	57.9%	31.5%	9	2	17	20	52.9%	10.0%	8	3	10	7	80.0%	42.9%	40	23	20	12	8	6	2	4	12	15	14	14
Stony Brook	AE	57	50	18	21	50	57	36.0%	36.8%	4	6	13	22	30.8%	27.3%	17	2	21	5	81.0%	40.0%	41	32	7	6	5	6	3	4	15	13	17	22
New Hampshire	AE	83	74	25	27	48	56	52.1%	48.2%	8	6	17	25	47.1%	24.0%	25	14	33	21	75.8%	66.7%	29	29	13	19	1	3	2	2	8	8	17	23
Hartford	AE	69	63	21	24	48	56	43.8%	42.9%	6	4	16	18	37.5%	22.2%	21	11	32	15	65.6%	73.3%	36	28	9	9	4	7	3	2	10	10	17	24
UMass-Lowell	AE	91	81	34	33	57	60	59.6%	55.0%	10	7	17	21	58.8%	33.3%	13	8	16	15	81.3%	53.3%	32	26	11	16	5	9	4	2	16	12	18	14
																																	
Tot. W		OOC	973	846	351	317	707	701	49.6%	45.2%	70	88	184	267	38.0%	33.0%	201	124	263	179	76.4%	69.3%	444	341	171	163	58	67	17	40	134	141	186	248
		AE	615	500	205	193	425	453	48.2%	42.6%	53	48	118	169	44.9%	28.4%	152	66	195	106	77.9%	62.3%	290	233	108	112	38	46	33	26	95	97	131	166
																																	
Avg. W		OOC	81.1	70.5	29.3	26.4	58.9	58.4	49.6%	45.2%	5.8	7.3	15.3	22.3	38.0%	33.0%	16.8	10.3	21.9	14.9	76.4%	69.3%	37.0	28.4	14.3	13.6	4.8	5.6	1.4	3.3	11.2	11.8	15.5	20.7
		AE	76.9	62.5	25.6	24.1	53.1	56.6	48.2%	42.6%	6.6	6.0	14.8	21.1	44.9%	28.4%	19.0	8.3	24.4	13.3	77.9%	62.3%	36.3	29.1	13.5	14.0	4.8	5.8	4.1	3.3	11.9	12.1	16.4	20.8
																																	
Tot. W			1588	1346	556	510	1132	1154	49.1%	44.2%	123	136	302	436	40.7%	31.2%	353	190	458	285	77.1%	66.7%	734	574	279	275	96	113	50	66	229	238	317	414
Avg. W			79.4	67.3	27.8	25.5	56.6	57.7	49.0%	44.3%	6.2	6.8	15.1	21.8	41.0%	31.3%	17.7	9.5	22.9	14.3	77.1%	64.4%	36.7	28.7	14.0	13.8	4.8	5.7	2.5	3.3	11.5	11.9	15.9	20.7
																																	
UAlbany Losses																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Monmouth	OOC	73	81	26	28	54	56	48.1%	50.0%	3	8	11	18	27.3%	44.4%	18	17	28	24	64.3%	70.8%	41	29	5	12	2	7	3	4	15	8	23	24
Memphis		OOC	58	67	21	23	61	49	34.4%	46.9%	4	4	17	17	23.5%	23.5%	12	17	15	24	80.0%	70.8%	38	33	8	10	4	7	2	11	14	12	18	16
Louisville	OOC	68	70	27	24	74	57	36.5%	42.1%	6	9	20	21	30.0%	42.9%	8	13	12	21	66.7%	61.9%	52	37	9	11	2	4	2	10	10	7	19	19
Hartford	AE	64	72	23	25	54	50	42.6%	50.0%	8	9	19	18	42.1%	50.0%	10	13	14	13	71.4%	100.0%	28	30	14	15	7	8	3	9	12	14	16	18
New Hampshire	AE	61	64	20	25	49	62	40.8%	40.3%	4	10	14	24	28.6%	41.7%	17	4	27	6	63.0%	66.7%	34	41	10	13	4	4	2	0	10	10	16	22
Binghamton	AE	66	79	24	24	59	52	40.7%	46.2%	5	6	16	16	31.3%	37.5%	13	25	16	32	81.3%	78.1%	33	35	9	12	4	4	2	4	12	10	22	15
Vermont		AE	50	61	20	22	51	51	39.2%	43.1%	1	6	11	16	9.1%	37.5%	9	11	12	16	75.0%	68.8%	30	35	3	9	2	3	6	6	11	10	17	14
Vermont		AE	67	72	27	24	61	52	44.3%	46.2%	5	4	15	12	33.3%	33.3%	8	20	11	20	72.7%	100.0%	33	30	19	15	4	0	3	4	6	8	19	14
UMBC		AE	60	68	22	24	58	49	37.9%	49.0%	8	7	23	18	34.8%	38.9%	8	13	9	15	88.9%	86.7%	37	25	9	15	3	6	2	2	15	11	15	15
																																	
Tot. L		OOC	199	218	74	75	189	162	39.2%	46.3%	13	21	48	56	27.1%	37.5%	38	47	55	69	69.1%	68.1%	131	99	22	33	8	18	7	25	39	27	60	59
		AE	368	416	136	144	332	316	41.0%	45.6%	31	42	98	104	31.6%	40.4%	65	86	89	102	73.0%	84.3%	195	196	64	79	24	25	18	25	66	63	105	98
																																	
Avg. L		OOC	66.3	72.7	24.7	25.0	63.0	54.0	39.2%	46.3%	4.3	7.0	16.0	18.7	27.1%	37.5%	12.7	15.7	18.3	23.0	69.1%	68.1%	43.7	33.0	7.3	11.0	2.7	6.0	2.3	8.3	13.0	9.0	20.0	19.7
		AE	61.3	69.3	22.7	24.0	55.3	52.7	41.0%	45.6%	5.2	7.0	16.3	17.3	31.6%	40.4%	10.8	14.3	14.8	17.0	73.0%	84.3%	32.5	32.7	10.7	13.2	4.0	4.2	3.0	4.2	11.0	10.5	17.5	16.3
																																	
Tot. L			567	634	210	219	521	478	40.3%	45.8%	44	63	146	160	30.1%	39.4%	103	133	144	171	71.5%	77.8%	326	295	86	112	32	43	25	50	105	90	165	157
Avg. L			63.0	70.4	23.3	24.3	57.9	53.1	40.5%	46.0%	4.9	7.0	16.2	17.8	28.9%	38.9%	11.4	14.8	16.0	19.0	73.7%	78.2%	36.2	32.8	9.6	12.4	3.6	4.8	2.8	5.6	11.7	10.0	18.3	17.4
																																	
Tot. (all)		2155	1980	766	729	1653	1632	46.3%	44.7%	167	199	448	596	37.3%	33.4%	456	323	602	456	75.7%	70.8%	1060	869	365	387	128	156	75	116	334	328	482	571
Avg. (all)		74.3	68.3	26.4	25.1	57.0	56.3	46.4%	44.8%	5.8	6.9	15.4	20.6	37.3%	33.6%	15.7	11.1	20.8	15.7	76.0%	68.7%	36.6	30.0	12.6	13.3	4.4	5.4	2.6	4.0	11.5	11.3	16.6	19.7
			PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	

To be completely honest you are 100 percent right. I was just trying not to make my 10th consecutive negative post for the game . Haha.

 

Campbell has been terrible, however like Click has said b4 we have nobody to replace him .

 

I will post this is more detail after the season however we lose Stire, Foster, and Charles. Click say Lulka will be a beast but he will only be a freshman . If I'm will Brown am I going to waste Cremos and Nichols Sr years? U may think I'm crazy but if I'm Brown I may bring in 2 5th year Srs unless I can get a can't miss JUCO player. Season not over , just food for thought.

 

 

I don't know if Lulka will be a beast but everything I heard is that he's very talented...he will be a freshman and will need time, maybe even a season or season and a half to get going. Let's not put to much pressure on a kid who's never played a single minute of D1 hoops. He is talented though I believe...very talented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Just got done watching the game...

 

Campbell has played excellence defense today. But he is just such a liability of offense. It really hurts spacing.

Gonna have to disagree. He was on Lyles most of the game and Lyles put up big numbers. Granted Lyles beat Joe a few times too, but Campbell was on him probably 60% of the game if not 75%.

 

And he can't buy a bucket to save his life...that wide open 3 at the end of the 2nd half couldn't be more wide open. He promptly bricked it.

#ReturnTheScholarship #HitTheRoadJaErmDevonte

 

I asked the wife during the game when were up 12 if we made it to the title round in Burlington again if she'd like to attend (we did last year). That was premature on my part. This team won't make it to the championship round. Might not even make it to the semifinals. I just don't see how. We'll be lucky to make it out of the first round with these types of mental lapses (we had like 4 TO's in a row at one point).

 

Waste of a season...Joe and David have yet to win a championship. We're in a dry spell now. UVM is basically a lock to win it all.

UAlbany Wins																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Iona		OOC	69	67	24	26	62	59	38.7%	44.1%	4	4	15	22	26.7%	18.2%	17	11	19	14	89.5%	78.6%	47	27	6	14	1	6	0	3	13	7	16	21
Boston U	OOC	88	74	32	29	56	65	57.1%	44.6%	3	8	5	27	60.0%	29.6%	21	8	29	11	72.4%	72.7%	38	27	11	13	2	7	1	4	11	7	15	21
Yale		OOC	80	72	32	28	59	67	54.2%	41.8%	3	7	14	28	21.4%	25.0%	13	9	19	13	68.4%	69.2%	40	30	16	10	4	6	3	5	15	13	15	17
Oneonta		OOC	102	77	37	23	72	57	51.4%	40.4%	7	10	21	25	33.3%	40.0%	21	21	28	28	75.0%	75.0%	48	31	17	13	4	3	0	3	7	14	24	28
Dartmouth	OOC	91	73	34	27	64	49	53.1%	55.1%	8	8	17	17	47.1%	47.1%	15	11	16	12	93.8%	91.7%	28	25	13	11	8	5	0	7	12	20	13	19
Holy Cross	OOC	78	62	31	24	58	48	53.4%	50.0%	10	5	21	18	47.6%	27.8%	6	9	10	14	60.0%	64.3%	32	23	18	11	5	3	1	4	7	9	15	14
Colgate		OOC	75	69	25	25	59	55	42.4%	45.5%	6	8	18	22	33.3%	36.4%	19	11	23	16	82.6%	68.8%	39	24	14	9	7	7	1	1	11	9	15	20
Columbia	OOC	86	82	28	31	62	61	45.2%	50.8%	6	9	13	20	46.2%	45.0%	24	11	29	18	82.8%	61.1%	37	36	13	19	11	3	1	3	9	16	15	25
Bryant		OOC	84	68	33	24	61	61	54.1%	39.3%	9	11	17	26	52.9%	42.3%	9	9	13	16	69.2%	56.3%	40	27	21	21	2	10	2	4	14	9	14	16
Siena		OOC	74	69	26	24	55	50	47.3%	48.0%	5	9	15	20	33.3%	45.0%	17	12	25	17	68.0%	70.6%	30	27	11	10	8	5	1	3	12	16	15	22
Canisius	OOC	68	65	26	28	53	61	49.1%	45.9%	2	6	10	22	20.0%	27.3%	14	3	20	7	70.0%	42.9%	33	29	11	19	2	8	3	1	12	10	11	20
Kent State	OOC	78	68	23	28	46	68	50.0%	41.2%	7	3	18	20	38.9%	15.0%	25	9	32	13	78.1%	69.2%	32	35	20	13	4	4	4	2	11	11	18	25
Stony Brook	AE	78	65	29	25	55	60	52.7%	41.7%	6	10	9	20	66.7%	50.0%	14	5	17	8	82.4%	62.5%	37	28	20	17	2	5	8	5	11	9	11	18
Maine		AE	84	66	21	21	58	56	36.2%	37.5%	7	6	17	22	41.2%	27.3%	35	18	44	27	79.5%	66.7%	43	38	13	14	3	4	6	4	9	12	23	32
UMass-Lowell	AE	70	62	24	25	52	54	46.2%	46.3%	3	7	12	21	25.0%	33.3%	19	5	22	8	86.4%	62.5%	32	29	15	19	10	6	5	3	14	18	14	19
UMBC		AE	83	39	33	17	57	54	57.9%	31.5%	9	2	17	20	52.9%	10.0%	8	3	10	7	80.0%	42.9%	40	23	20	12	8	6	2	4	12	15	14	14
Stony Brook	AE	57	50	18	21	50	57	36.0%	36.8%	4	6	13	22	30.8%	27.3%	17	2	21	5	81.0%	40.0%	41	32	7	6	5	6	3	4	15	13	17	22
New Hampshire	AE	83	74	25	27	48	56	52.1%	48.2%	8	6	17	25	47.1%	24.0%	25	14	33	21	75.8%	66.7%	29	29	13	19	1	3	2	2	8	8	17	23
Hartford	AE	69	63	21	24	48	56	43.8%	42.9%	6	4	16	18	37.5%	22.2%	21	11	32	15	65.6%	73.3%	36	28	9	9	4	7	3	2	10	10	17	24
UMass-Lowell	AE	91	81	34	33	57	60	59.6%	55.0%	10	7	17	21	58.8%	33.3%	13	8	16	15	81.3%	53.3%	32	26	11	16	5	9	4	2	16	12	18	14
																																	
Tot. W		OOC	973	846	351	317	707	701	49.6%	45.2%	70	88	184	267	38.0%	33.0%	201	124	263	179	76.4%	69.3%	444	341	171	163	58	67	17	40	134	141	186	248
		AE	615	500	205	193	425	453	48.2%	42.6%	53	48	118	169	44.9%	28.4%	152	66	195	106	77.9%	62.3%	290	233	108	112	38	46	33	26	95	97	131	166
																																	
Avg. W		OOC	81.1	70.5	29.3	26.4	58.9	58.4	49.6%	45.2%	5.8	7.3	15.3	22.3	38.0%	33.0%	16.8	10.3	21.9	14.9	76.4%	69.3%	37.0	28.4	14.3	13.6	4.8	5.6	1.4	3.3	11.2	11.8	15.5	20.7
		AE	76.9	62.5	25.6	24.1	53.1	56.6	48.2%	42.6%	6.6	6.0	14.8	21.1	44.9%	28.4%	19.0	8.3	24.4	13.3	77.9%	62.3%	36.3	29.1	13.5	14.0	4.8	5.8	4.1	3.3	11.9	12.1	16.4	20.8
																																	
Tot. W			1588	1346	556	510	1132	1154	49.1%	44.2%	123	136	302	436	40.7%	31.2%	353	190	458	285	77.1%	66.7%	734	574	279	275	96	113	50	66	229	238	317	414
Avg. W			79.4	67.3	27.8	25.5	56.6	57.7	49.0%	44.3%	6.2	6.8	15.1	21.8	41.0%	31.3%	17.7	9.5	22.9	14.3	77.1%	64.4%	36.7	28.7	14.0	13.8	4.8	5.7	2.5	3.3	11.5	11.9	15.9	20.7
																																	
UAlbany Losses																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Monmouth	OOC	73	81	26	28	54	56	48.1%	50.0%	3	8	11	18	27.3%	44.4%	18	17	28	24	64.3%	70.8%	41	29	5	12	2	7	3	4	15	8	23	24
Memphis		OOC	58	67	21	23	61	49	34.4%	46.9%	4	4	17	17	23.5%	23.5%	12	17	15	24	80.0%	70.8%	38	33	8	10	4	7	2	11	14	12	18	16
Louisville	OOC	68	70	27	24	74	57	36.5%	42.1%	6	9	20	21	30.0%	42.9%	8	13	12	21	66.7%	61.9%	52	37	9	11	2	4	2	10	10	7	19	19
Hartford	AE	64	72	23	25	54	50	42.6%	50.0%	8	9	19	18	42.1%	50.0%	10	13	14	13	71.4%	100.0%	28	30	14	15	7	8	3	9	12	14	16	18
New Hampshire	AE	61	64	20	25	49	62	40.8%	40.3%	4	10	14	24	28.6%	41.7%	17	4	27	6	63.0%	66.7%	34	41	10	13	4	4	2	0	10	10	16	22
Binghamton	AE	66	79	24	24	59	52	40.7%	46.2%	5	6	16	16	31.3%	37.5%	13	25	16	32	81.3%	78.1%	33	35	9	12	4	4	2	4	12	10	22	15
Vermont		AE	50	61	20	22	51	51	39.2%	43.1%	1	6	11	16	9.1%	37.5%	9	11	12	16	75.0%	68.8%	30	35	3	9	2	3	6	6	11	10	17	14
Vermont		AE	67	72	27	24	61	52	44.3%	46.2%	5	4	15	12	33.3%	33.3%	8	20	11	20	72.7%	100.0%	33	30	19	15	4	0	3	4	6	8	19	14
UMBC		AE	60	68	22	24	58	49	37.9%	49.0%	8	7	23	18	34.8%	38.9%	8	13	9	15	88.9%	86.7%	37	25	9	15	3	6	2	2	15	11	15	15
																																	
Tot. L		OOC	199	218	74	75	189	162	39.2%	46.3%	13	21	48	56	27.1%	37.5%	38	47	55	69	69.1%	68.1%	131	99	22	33	8	18	7	25	39	27	60	59
		AE	368	416	136	144	332	316	41.0%	45.6%	31	42	98	104	31.6%	40.4%	65	86	89	102	73.0%	84.3%	195	196	64	79	24	25	18	25	66	63	105	98
																																	
Avg. L		OOC	66.3	72.7	24.7	25.0	63.0	54.0	39.2%	46.3%	4.3	7.0	16.0	18.7	27.1%	37.5%	12.7	15.7	18.3	23.0	69.1%	68.1%	43.7	33.0	7.3	11.0	2.7	6.0	2.3	8.3	13.0	9.0	20.0	19.7
		AE	61.3	69.3	22.7	24.0	55.3	52.7	41.0%	45.6%	5.2	7.0	16.3	17.3	31.6%	40.4%	10.8	14.3	14.8	17.0	73.0%	84.3%	32.5	32.7	10.7	13.2	4.0	4.2	3.0	4.2	11.0	10.5	17.5	16.3
																																	
Tot. L			567	634	210	219	521	478	40.3%	45.8%	44	63	146	160	30.1%	39.4%	103	133	144	171	71.5%	77.8%	326	295	86	112	32	43	25	50	105	90	165	157
Avg. L			63.0	70.4	23.3	24.3	57.9	53.1	40.5%	46.0%	4.9	7.0	16.2	17.8	28.9%	38.9%	11.4	14.8	16.0	19.0	73.7%	78.2%	36.2	32.8	9.6	12.4	3.6	4.8	2.8	5.6	11.7	10.0	18.3	17.4
																																	
Tot. (all)		2155	1980	766	729	1653	1632	46.3%	44.7%	167	199	448	596	37.3%	33.4%	456	323	602	456	75.7%	70.8%	1060	869	365	387	128	156	75	116	334	328	482	571
Avg. (all)		74.3	68.3	26.4	25.1	57.0	56.3	46.4%	44.8%	5.8	6.9	15.4	20.6	37.3%	33.6%	15.7	11.1	20.8	15.7	76.0%	68.7%	36.6	30.0	12.6	13.3	4.4	5.4	2.6	4.0	11.5	11.3	16.6	19.7
			PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	

To be completely honest you are 100 percent right. I was just trying not to make my 10th consecutive negative post for the game . Haha.

 

Campbell has been terrible, however like Click has said b4 we have nobody to replace him .

 

I will post this is more detail after the season however we lose Stire, Foster, and Charles. Click say Lulka will be a beast but he will only be a freshman . If I'm will Brown am I going to waste Cremos and Nichols Sr years? U may think I'm crazy but if I'm Brown I may bring in 2 5th year Srs unless I can get a can't miss JUCO player. Season not over , just food for thought.

I don't know if Lulka will be a beast but everything I heard is that he's very talented...he will be a freshman and will need time, maybe even a season or season and a half to get going. Let's not put to much pressure on a kid who's never played a single minute of D1 hoops. He is talented though I believe...very talented.

That was kind of my point . I would bring in at least one 5th year guy ... maybe two. Let Lulka make is mistakes playing 10-15 a game. Anymore then that for a freshman will me tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still do not believe we utilized Foster correctly. With all his defensive lapses and mental mistakes, we should have let him ride it out in game to work through it so he could have become a force come conference play. Also with Charles scoring ability hes probably best suited coming off the bench for instant offense, similar to his role last year.

 

WB doghouse is as deep and dark as ever this year. Players rarely come out of that. I cant even blame the bench when youve got such little room for error since day one. How do you ever expect them to play loose and have fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...