Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

[MBB] Game #30: 2/24/18 - 7:00pm - vs Maine


Eli

Recommended Posts


UAlbany Wins
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **
Opponent Type PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% RBG AST STL BLK TO FOUL
Iona OOC 69 67 24 26 62 59 38.7% 44.1% 4 4 15 22 26.7% 18.2% 17 11 19 14 89.5% 78.6% 47 27 6 14 1 6 0 3 13 7 16 21
Boston U OOC 88 74 32 29 56 65 57.1% 44.6% 3 8 5 27 60.0% 29.6% 21 8 29 11 72.4% 72.7% 38 27 11 13 2 7 1 4 11 7 15 21
Yale OOC 80 72 32 28 59 67 54.2% 41.8% 3 7 14 28 21.4% 25.0% 13 9 19 13 68.4% 69.2% 40 30 16 10 4 6 3 5 15 13 15 17
Oneonta OOC 102 77 37 23 72 57 51.4% 40.4% 7 10 21 25 33.3% 40.0% 21 21 28 28 75.0% 75.0% 48 31 17 13 4 3 0 3 7 14 24 28
Dartmouth OOC 91 73 34 27 64 49 53.1% 55.1% 8 8 17 17 47.1% 47.1% 15 11 16 12 93.8% 91.7% 28 25 13 11 8 5 0 7 12 20 13 19
Holy Cross OOC 78 62 31 24 58 48 53.4% 50.0% 10 5 21 18 47.6% 27.8% 6 9 10 14 60.0% 64.3% 32 23 18 11 5 3 1 4 7 9 15 14
Colgate OOC 75 69 25 25 59 55 42.4% 45.5% 6 8 18 22 33.3% 36.4% 19 11 23 16 82.6% 68.8% 39 24 14 9 7 7 1 1 11 9 15 20
Columbia OOC 86 82 28 31 62 61 45.2% 50.8% 6 9 13 20 46.2% 45.0% 24 11 29 18 82.8% 61.1% 37 36 13 19 11 3 1 3 9 16 15 25
Bryant OOC 84 68 33 24 61 61 54.1% 39.3% 9 11 17 26 52.9% 42.3% 9 9 13 16 69.2% 56.3% 40 27 21 21 2 10 2 4 14 9 14 16
Siena OOC 74 69 26 24 55 50 47.3% 48.0% 5 9 15 20 33.3% 45.0% 17 12 25 17 68.0% 70.6% 30 27 11 10 8 5 1 3 12 16 15 22
Canisius OOC 68 65 26 28 53 61 49.1% 45.9% 2 6 10 22 20.0% 27.3% 14 3 20 7 70.0% 42.9% 33 29 11 19 2 8 3 1 12 10 11 20
Kent State OOC 78 68 23 28 46 68 50.0% 41.2% 7 3 18 20 38.9% 15.0% 25 9 32 13 78.1% 69.2% 32 35 20 13 4 4 4 2 11 11 18 25
Stony Brook AE 78 65 29 25 55 60 52.7% 41.7% 6 10 9 20 66.7% 50.0% 14 5 17 8 82.4% 62.5% 37 28 20 17 2 5 8 5 11 9 11 18
Maine AE 84 66 21 21 58 56 36.2% 37.5% 7 6 17 22 41.2% 27.3% 35 18 44 27 79.5% 66.7% 43 38 13 14 3 4 6 4 9 12 23 32
UMass-Lowell AE 70 62 24 25 52 54 46.2% 46.3% 3 7 12 21 25.0% 33.3% 19 5 22 8 86.4% 62.5% 32 29 15 19 10 6 5 3 14 18 14 19
UMBC AE 83 39 33 17 57 54 57.9% 31.5% 9 2 17 20 52.9% 10.0% 8 3 10 7 80.0% 42.9% 40 23 20 12 8 6 2 4 12 15 14 14
Stony Brook AE 57 50 18 21 50 57 36.0% 36.8% 4 6 13 22 30.8% 27.3% 17 2 21 5 81.0% 40.0% 41 32 7 6 5 6 3 4 15 13 17 22
New Hampshire AE 83 74 25 27 48 56 52.1% 48.2% 8 6 17 25 47.1% 24.0% 25 14 33 21 75.8% 66.7% 29 29 13 19 1 3 2 2 8 8 17 23
Hartford AE 69 63 21 24 48 56 43.8% 42.9% 6 4 16 18 37.5% 22.2% 21 11 32 15 65.6% 73.3% 36 28 9 9 4 7 3 2 10 10 17 24
UMass-Lowell AE 91 81 34 33 57 60 59.6% 55.0% 10 7 17 21 58.8% 33.3% 13 8 16 15 81.3% 53.3% 32 26 11 16 5 9 4 2 16 12 18 14
Maine AE 89 79 27 31 65 59 41.5% 52.5% 6 6 16 16 37.5% 37.5% 29 11 37 17 78.4% 64.7% 45 26 12 17 11 6 1 9 14 19 17 27

Tot. W OOC 973 846 351 317 707 701 49.6% 45.2% 70 88 184 267 38.0% 33.0% 201 124 263 179 76.4% 69.3% 444 341 171 163 58 67 17 40 134 141 186 248
AE 704 579 232 224 490 512 47.3% 43.8% 59 54 134 185 44.0% 29.2% 181 77 232 123 78.0% 62.6% 335 259 120 129 49 52 34 35 109 116 148 193

Avg. W OOC 81.1 70.5 29.3 26.4 58.9 58.4 49.6% 45.2% 5.8 7.3 15.3 22.3 38.0% 33.0% 16.8 10.3 21.9 14.9 76.4% 69.3% 37.0 28.4 14.3 13.6 4.8 5.6 1.4 3.3 11.2 11.8 15.5 20.7
AE 78.2 64.3 25.8 24.9 54.4 56.9 47.3% 43.8% 6.6 6.0 14.9 20.6 44.0% 29.2% 20.1 8.6 25.8 13.7 78.0% 62.6% 37.2 28.8 13.3 14.3 5.4 5.8 3.8 3.9 12.1 12.9 16.4 21.4

Tot. W 1677 1425 583 541 1197 1213 48.7% 44.6% 129 142 318 452 40.6% 31.4% 382 201 495 302 77.2% 66.6% 779 600 291 292 107 119 51 75 243 257 334 441
Avg. W 79.9 67.9 27.8 25.8 57.0 57.8 48.7% 44.7% 6.1 6.8 15.1 21.5 40.9% 31.6% 18.2 9.6 23.6 14.4 77.1% 64.4% 37.1 28.6 13.9 13.9 5.1 5.7 2.4 3.6 11.6 12.2 15.9 21.0

UAlbany Losses
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **
Opponent Type PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% RBG AST STL BLK TO FOUL
Monmouth OOC 73 81 26 28 54 56 48.1% 50.0% 3 8 11 18 27.3% 44.4% 18 17 28 24 64.3% 70.8% 41 29 5 12 2 7 3 4 15 8 23 24
Memphis OOC 58 67 21 23 61 49 34.4% 46.9% 4 4 17 17 23.5% 23.5% 12 17 15 24 80.0% 70.8% 38 33 8 10 4 7 2 11 14 12 18 16
Louisville OOC 68 70 27 24 74 57 36.5% 42.1% 6 9 20 21 30.0% 42.9% 8 13 12 21 66.7% 61.9% 52 37 9 11 2 4 2 10 10 7 19 19
Hartford AE 64 72 23 25 54 50 42.6% 50.0% 8 9 19 18 42.1% 50.0% 10 13 14 13 71.4% 100.0% 28 30 14 15 7 8 3 9 12 14 16 18
New Hampshire AE 61 64 20 25 49 62 40.8% 40.3% 4 10 14 24 28.6% 41.7% 17 4 27 6 63.0% 66.7% 34 41 10 13 4 4 2 0 10 10 16 22
Binghamton AE 66 79 24 24 59 52 40.7% 46.2% 5 6 16 16 31.3% 37.5% 13 25 16 32 81.3% 78.1% 33 35 9 12 4 4 2 4 12 10 22 15
Vermont AE 50 61 20 22 51 51 39.2% 43.1% 1 6 11 16 9.1% 37.5% 9 11 12 16 75.0% 68.8% 30 35 3 9 2 3 6 6 11 10 17 14
Vermont AE 67 72 27 24 61 52 44.3% 46.2% 5 4 15 12 33.3% 33.3% 8 20 11 20 72.7% 100.0% 33 30 19 15 4 0 3 4 6 8 19 14
UMBC AE 60 68 22 24 58 49 37.9% 49.0% 8 7 23 18 34.8% 38.9% 8 13 9 15 88.9% 86.7% 37 25 9 15 3 6 2 2 15 11 15 15

Tot. L OOC 199 218 74 75 189 162 39.2% 46.3% 13 21 48 56 27.1% 37.5% 38 47 55 69 69.1% 68.1% 131 99 22 33 8 18 7 25 39 27 60 59
AE 368 416 136 144 332 316 41.0% 45.6% 31 42 98 104 31.6% 40.4% 65 86 89 102 73.0% 84.3% 195 196 64 79 24 25 18 25 66 63 105 98

Avg. L OOC 66.3 72.7 24.7 25.0 63.0 54.0 39.2% 46.3% 4.3 7.0 16.0 18.7 27.1% 37.5% 12.7 15.7 18.3 23.0 69.1% 68.1% 43.7 33.0 7.3 11.0 2.7 6.0 2.3 8.3 13.0 9.0 20.0 19.7
AE 61.3 69.3 22.7 24.0 55.3 52.7 41.0% 45.6% 5.2 7.0 16.3 17.3 31.6% 40.4% 10.8 14.3 14.8 17.0 73.0% 84.3% 32.5 32.7 10.7 13.2 4.0 4.2 3.0 4.2 11.0 10.5 17.5 16.3

Tot. L 567 634 210 219 521 478 40.3% 45.8% 44 63 146 160 30.1% 39.4% 103 133 144 171 71.5% 77.8% 326 295 86 112 32 43 25 50 105 90 165 157
Avg. L 63.0 70.4 23.3 24.3 57.9 53.1 40.5% 46.0% 4.9 7.0 16.2 17.8 28.9% 38.9% 11.4 14.8 16.0 19.0 73.7% 78.2% 36.2 32.8 9.6 12.4 3.6 4.8 2.8 5.6 11.7 10.0 18.3 17.4

Tot. (all) 2244 2059 793 760 1718 1691 46.2% 44.9% 173 205 464 612 37.3% 33.5% 485 334 639 473 75.9% 70.6% 1105 895 377 404 139 162 76 125 348 347 499 598
Avg. (all) 74.8 68.6 26.4 25.3 57.3 56.4 46.2% 45.1% 5.8 6.8 15.5 20.4 37.3% 33.8% 16.2 11.1 21.3 15.8 76.1% 68.6% 36.8 29.8 12.6 13.5 4.6 5.4 2.5 4.2 11.6 11.6 16.6 19.9
PTS FGM FGA FG% 3PTM 3PTA 3PT% FTM FTA FT% RBG AST STL BLK TO FOUL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird game to say the least. I'm guessing Travis won't play on Tuesday against Bing.

 

Cremo entered the top 10 all-time in scoring tonight.

 

Refs were hot garbage.

Andrew Maira and that other guy we've seen a bunch of times ALWAYS have their heads up their rear ends.

First 25 minutes of the game, they were literally not calling anything unless someone was bleeding. Then all of a sudden they started calling every dang touch.

 

I can't stand referees. The entire profession. 95% of them suck at their jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I don't understand or like is that EVERY starter played at least 33 mins against Maine.... freaken MAINE. In a game that does not mean really anything. We have a major tendency to fade late in games. (Due to really playing 6-7 players.)

 

Why not playing our starters around 25 mins against Maine and Binghamton?

 

Because I do believe come tournament time we play our best 5 for as long as they can go. But let's get them a little rest before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I don't understand or like is that EVERY starter played at least 33 mins against Maine.... freaken MAINE. In a game that does not mean really anything. We have a major tendency to fade late in games. (Due to really playing 6-7 players.)

 

Why not playing our starters around 25 mins against Maine and Binghamton?

 

Because I do believe come tournament time we play our best 5 for as long as they can go. But let's get them a little rest before then.

Agreed. Was thinking the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What I don't understand or like is that EVERY starter played at least 33 mins against Maine.... freaken MAINE. In a game that does not mean really anything. We have a major tendency to fade late in games. (Due to really playing 6-7 players.)

 

Why not playing our starters around 25 mins against Maine and Binghamton?

 

Because I do believe come tournament time we play our best 5 for as long as they can go. But let's get them a little rest before then.

Agreed. Was thinking the same thing.

 

 

 

Thought the same thing when Nichols was on the floor with cramping, Cremo had leg problems, and then Charles got hurt. Hard to question the Coach, but in this case, I think he should have gone deep into the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

What I don't understand or like is that EVERY starter played at least 33 mins against Maine.... freaken MAINE. In a game that does not mean really anything. We have a major tendency to fade late in games. (Due to really playing 6-7 players.)

 

Why not playing our starters around 25 mins against Maine and Binghamton?

 

Because I do believe come tournament time we play our best 5 for as long as they can go. But let's get them a little rest before then.

Agreed. Was thinking the same thing.

 

 

 

Thought the same thing when Nichols was on the floor with cramping, Cremo had leg problems, and then Charles got hurt. Hard to question the Coach, but in this case, I think he should have gone deep into the bench.

 

 

 

He should have gone deep into his bench to lose? If he pulls the starters with about 5 minutes to go we lose, I am almost fairly certain of that. There was a big part of me that wanted to starters out but when the team couldn't stretch the lead to 15 points or so under 5 minutes they were going to have to stay in. Was it a meaningless game? I was a meaningless game to win, but not if we lost. If we lost to Maine, who I thought played really hard, it would have been a bigger problem that Davids cramps. Travis' injury could loom large but if the group of starters wasn't sleep walking through the last 6-8 minutes then maybe they could have enjoyed some time on the bench.

 

Bing is going to be the same way. Meaningless if you win, but not if you lose. You don't want to walk into the tourney coming off a season sweep by the team that didn't even make the tourney. If you want the starters off the floor, the bench MUST be better.

Edited by Dane06grad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...