Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Eli

[MBB] Game #6: 11/23/18 - 8PM @ Milwaukee

Recommended Posts

Attendance was 952 (8.8% of capacity)

Coach mentioned it was cold (hockey arena), maybe a little tired, need more from the bench.

Puk played one year for Durham, England, didn’t touch a ball for two years, now playing in an ex-college league in Madison with some ex-UW guys, is still studying for his optometry (?) school 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, UAalum72 said:

Puk played one year for Durham, England, didn’t touch a ball for two years, now playing in an ex-college league in Madison with some ex-UW guys, is still studying for his optometry (?) school 

Sucks that his bball career didn't quite pan out but he's going to be one MASSIVE optometrist lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stats tracker:

We cannot allow teams to have such high FG/3PT%'s and expect to win. We get them some 50% and we probably win the game. They shot lights out and only won by 9.

UAlbany Wins																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Canisius	OOC	75	66	25	23	47	60	53.2%	38.3%	8	6	18	30	44.4%	20.0%	17	14	25	25	68.0%	56.0%	37	32	17	12	5	11	1	2	18	8	19	24
Oneonta		OOC	79	62	30	24	63	62	47.6%	38.7%	7	9	22	24	31.8%	37.5%	12	5	16	8	75.0%	62.5%	45	32	14	16	8	9	2	6	17	19	13	20
																																	
Tot. W			154	128	55	47	110	122	50.0%	38.5%	15	15	40	54	37.5%	27.8%	29	19	41	33	70.7%	57.6%	82	64	31	28	13	20	3	8	35	27	32	44
Avg. W			77.0	64.0	27.5	23.5	55.0	61.0	50.4%	38.5%	7.5	7.5	20.0	27.0	38.1%	28.8%	14.5	9.5	20.5	16.5	71.5%	59.3%	41.0	32.0	15.5	14.0	6.5	10.0	1.5	4.0	17.5	13.5	16.0	22.0
																																	
UAlbany Losses																																	
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																	
Opponent	Type	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Iona		OOC	68	72	21	25	58	57	36.2%	43.9%	11	6	24	25	45.8%	24.0%	15	16	16	25	93.8%	64.0%	39	34	10	16	0	12	0	2	22	13	20	16
Boston Univ.	OOC	61	71	20	28	59	55	33.9%	50.9%	5	10	20	22	25.0%	45.5%	16	5	22	11	72.7%	45.5%	33	40	14	18	7	3	3	4	8	14	13	21
Holy Cross	OOC	65	69	23	26	63	56	36.5%	46.4%	10	5	28	17	35.7%	29.4%	9	12	14	20	64.3%	60.0%	45	32	16	18	5	6	1	7	15	9	22	12
UW-Milwaukee	OOC	70	79	23	31	59	53	39.0%	58.5%	10	12	30	21	33.3%	57.1%	14	5	17	7	82.4%	71.4%	28	32	12	19	7	1	2	4	8	12	9	14

Tot. L			264	291	87	110	239	221	36.4%	49.8%	36	33	102	85	35.3%	38.8%	54	38	69	63	78.3%	60.3%	145	138	52	71	19	22	6	17	53	48	64	63
Avg. L			66.0	72.8	21.8	27.5	59.8	55.3	36.4%	49.9%	9.0	8.3	25.5	21.3	35.0%	39.0%	13.5	9.5	17.3	15.8	78.3%	60.2%	36.3	34.5	13.0	17.8	4.8	5.5	1.5	4.3	13.3	12.0	16.0	15.8
																																	
Tot. (all)		418	419	142	157	349	343	40.7%	45.8%	51	48	142	139	35.9%	34.5%	83	57	110	96	75.5%	59.4%	227	202	83	99	32	42	9	25	88	75	96	107
Avg. (all)		69.7	69.8	23.7	26.2	58.2	57.2	41.1%	46.1%	8.5	8.0	23.7	23.2	36.0%	35.6%	13.8	9.5	18.3	16.0	76.0%	59.9%	37.8	33.7	13.8	16.5	5.3	7.0	1.5	4.2	14.7	12.5	16.0	17.8
			PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		RBG		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yeah, WB said the scout on Wright was “SHOOTER - make him dribble.” Didn’t execute.

He was telling Miller you can’t make up ground if you don’t stop the other team from scoring

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the pieces are there for a successful conference campaign. They look great at times, but still rugged at others. I’m sure coach has no shortage of learn from your mistakes video. The flagrant was the real killer, but I do believe it was warranted...intentional or not. Very athletic team was UWM. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am starting to fear a repeat of last year. Obviously not record wise; but what looked like a deep bench has been almost nil. When Rizzuto and Flory(IF) return may be the depth with pan out? The other similarities that are getting me nervous:  no/poor perimeter D;  all/most of our offense come from two people and if one struggles or is inconsistent (aka Clark = Nichols) we're in trouble;  and Campbell still can't hit the broad side of a barn {shooting marginally better overall, but 2 for 10 yesterday.} Was not so much of a problem last year with Stire and Charles, but this year we have to be leading the country on having shots BLOCKED; [I know a lot of the blocks are against our guards, but the bigs also seem to be eating the ball a lot.] 

Not panicking  YET;  just saying even though it is only six games in and I know I know the team is young, I am seeing some fearful things I do not like.

Edited by dslyank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dslyank said:

I am starting to fear a repeat of last year. Obviously not record wise; but what looked like a deep bench has been almost nil. When Rizzuto and Flory(IF) return may be the depth with pan out? The other similarities that are getting me nervous:  no/poor perimeter D;  all/most of our offense come from two people and if one struggles or is inconsistent (aka Clark = Nichols) we're in trouble;  and Campbell still can't hit the broad side of a barn {shooting marginally better overall, but 2 for 10 yesterday.} Was not so much of a problem last year with Stire and Charles, but this year we have to be leading the country on having shots BLOCKED; [I know a lot of the blocks are against our guards, but the bigs also seem to be eating the ball a lot.] 

Not panicking  YET;  just saying even though it is only six games in and I know I know the team is young, I am seeing some fearful things I do not like.

Normally I would be 100 percent with you, but because this team is sooo young I am willing to given them a pass until conference play begins. We are not going to beat Vermont this year so I would redshirt the 2 injured players. The conference is again not strong so I'm hoping for the team to mature a little bit more and make a good run during conference play . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, jimbo said:

I think the pieces are there for a successful conference campaign. They look great at times, but still rugged at others. I’m sure coach has no shortage of learn from your mistakes video. The flagrant was the real killer, but I do believe it was warranted...intentional or not. Very athletic team was UWM. 

For those of us who sat in SEFCU to  three games, have been thinking the same thing.  The flagrant was a game changer however during the first half they showed they can turn things around. Can we get the kinks out 01-01-2019?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×