Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

vs Hartford - AE Tourney Round 1 - 3/1 - 7:30PM


Recommended Posts

Will said "David got us going early and then the crowd I thought fed off David's scoring.Tonight our crowd was outstanding. Our guys felt a true home court advantage tonight." - UA press release

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

In an era when some of the best "TV" shows are on Netflix, Amazon and Hulu, I'd say that ESPN3 qualifies as a national television

And Albany dropped 100 tonight.   Stony Brooks address is 100 Nicolls Rd..

It is just under two hours for me to drive up there. Weekends I can do it but weekdays are tough since the kids have separate activities in the evenings. I tried hard to work it out for tonight but it

 

 

That attendance seems very low... Not sure I agree. Seems to me like 2400 people.

How was attendance at the other 3 sites ?

Good enough to get me a tournament back?

 

 

Pretty sure UVM was sold out. Not sure about the others.

 

After going 16-0, I would hope their fans would come out. I think if we went 16-0 we'd also be drawing better. Albany as a whole is a front runner town.

 

Will said "David got us going early and then the crowd I thought fed off David's scoring.Tonight our crowd was outstanding. Our guys felt a true home court advantage tonight." - UA press release

 

Definitely was feeding off of his early start. You're welcome lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stats updated to include the post season. The number that jumped out to me that I had no idea about was our 25 assists! I know we had some great plays but, based on that number, it was a full 40 minute onslaught of teamwork. LOVE IT.


Also made it a tiny easier to glance at quickly for totals and averages.

UAlbany Wins																								
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																								
Opponent	FGM		FGA		FG%		FTM		FTA		FT%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		RBG		AST		TO	
Penn State	30	27	61	63	49.2%	42.9%	20	18	25	22	80.0%	81.8%	7	9	14	25	50.0%	36.0%	43	26	16	9	15	12
Oneonta	        38	20	81	71	46.9%	28.2%	16	11	25	13	64.0%	84.6%	5	5	12	27	41.7%	18.5%	69	31	15	11	12	13
Brown	        26	25	52	59	50.0%	42.4%	22	21	28	29	78.6%	72.4%	6	5	14	20	42.9%	25.0%	37	28	9	13	18	8
Siena	        27	23	52	49	51.9%	46.9%	21	19	32	25	65.6%	76.0%	6	7	12	22	50.0%	31.8%	29	31	15	11	6	11
Marist	        26	25	60	51	43.3%	49.0%	21	5	28	8	75.0%	62.5%	5	11	14	28	35.7%	39.3%	34	30	13	15	9	19
Colgate	        26	23	51	45	51.0%	51.1%	19	9	26	11	73.1%	81.8%	3	11	9	29	33.3%	37.9%	29	22	8	11	10	16
St. Francis BK	29	24	61	59	47.5%	40.7%	21	7	25	12	84.0%	58.3%	8	5	17	22	47.1%	22.7%	50	21	19	12	15	8
Columbia	21	24	52	51	40.4%	47.1%	24	12	28	18	85.7%	66.7%	4	7	12	23	33.3%	30.4%	39	27	8	16	15	13
Cornell	        27	22	62	49	43.5%	44.9%	11	5	16	9	68.8%	55.6%	4	10	16	31	25.0%	32.3%	43	24	14	14	10	13
UMBC	        28	16	54	49	51.9%	32.7%	16	10	20	15	80.0%	66.7%	5	11	8	27	62.5%	40.7%	41	26	8	11	11	13
Binghamton	35	22	54	48	64.8%	45.8%	7	13	11	14	63.6%	92.9%	7	8	12	24	58.3%	33.3%	26	22	17	12	8	13
Maine	        30	23	55	51	54.5%	45.1%	17	11	22	20	77.3%	55.0%	4	6	14	14	28.6%	42.9%	34	28	16	13	11	15
Hartford	25	19	55	55	45.5%	34.5%	19	11	27	16	70.4%	68.8%	5	12	14	36	35.7%	33.3%	44	29	11	14	13	13
Umass Lowell	32	30	61	58	52.5%	51.7%	19	10	24	13	79.2%	76.9%	7	7	13	17	53.8%	41.2%	33	30	20	15	10	14
UNH	        24	21	53	50	45.3%	42.0%	14	7	20	10	70.0%	70.0%	7	6	17	21	41.2%	28.6%	28	33	14	14	5	14
Binghamton	23	21	52	52	44.2%	40.4%	11	6	15	8	73.3%	75.0%	9	6	21	16	42.9%	37.5%	37	25	15	7	9	5
UMBC	        25	25	57	54	43.9%	46.3%	25	12	31	17	80.6%	70.6%	3	7	13	22	23.1%	31.8%	38	30	8	13	8	13
Maine	        29	17	70	51	41.4%	33.3%	8	13	10	23	80.0%	56.5%	8	9	23	19	34.8%	47.4%	40	36	15	10	3	9
Hartford	30	22	63	60	47.6%	36.7%	13	11	16	14	81.3%	78.6%	7	7	14	21	50.0%	33.3%	39	35	16	11	13	15
Hartford	35	27	57	64	61.4%	42.2%	17	12	21	14	81.0%	85.7%	13	5	25	20	52.0%	25.0%	37	26	25	11	11	11
																								
OOC W Tot.	250	213	532	497	47.0%	42.9%	175	107	233	147	75.1%	72.8%	48	70	120	227	40.0%	30.8%	373	240	117	112	110	113
AE W Tot.	281	216	574	528	49.0%	40.9%	149	104	196	150	76.0%	69.3%	62	79	149	217	41.6%	36.4%	360	294	140	120	91	124
AE Tour. Tot.	35	27	57	64	61.4%	42.2%	17	12	21	14	81.0%	85.7%	13	5	25	20	52.0%	25.0%	37	26	25	11	11	11
																								
OOC W Avg.	27.8	23.7	59.1	55.2	47.0%	42.9%	19.4	11.9	25.9	16.3	75.1%	72.8%	5.3	7.8	13.3	25.2	40.0%	30.8%	41.4	26.7	13.0	12.4	12.2	12.6
AE W Avg.	28.1	21.6	57.4	52.8	49.0%	40.9%	14.9	10.4	19.6	15.0	76.0%	69.3%	6.2	7.9	14.9	21.7	41.6%	36.4%	36	29.4	14.0	12.0	9.1	12.4
AE Tour. Avg.	35.0	27.0	57.0	64.0	61.4%	42.2%	17.0	12.0	21.0	14.0	81.0%	85.7%	13.0	5.0	25.0	20.0	52.0%	25.0%	37.0	26.0	25.0	11.0	11.0	11.0
																								
Total W	        566	456	1163	1089	48.7%	41.9%	341	223	450	311	75.8%	71.7%	123	154	294	464	41.8%	33.2%	770	560	282	243	212	248
Average W	28.3	22.8	58.2	54.5	48.8%	42.2%	17.1	11.2	22.5	15.6	75.6%	71.8%	6.2	7.7	14.7	23.2	42.1%	33.5%	38.5	28.0	14.1	12.2	10.6	12.4
																								
UAlbany Losses																								
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																								
Opponent	FGM		FGA		FG%		FTM		FTA		FT%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		RBG		AST		TO	
Cincinatti	20	28	48	61	41.7%	45.9%	9	13	14	20	64.3%	65.0%	2	5	14	21	14.3%	23.8%	33	34	8	16	22	10
Grand Canyon	27	29	59	69	45.8%	42.0%	15	14	21	21	71.4%	66.7%	8	10	21	24	38.1%	41.7%	36	33	10	15	13	9
Holy Cross	21	18	45	46	46.7%	39.1%	8	6	10	10	80.0%	60.0%	1	11	9	29	11.1%	37.9%	20	37	15	12	18	9
Yale	        22	22	50	56	44.0%	39.3%	9	4	10	5	90.0%	80.0%	2	11	12	29	16.7%	37.9%	31	33	13	15	12	13
Canisius	27	26	66	57	40.9%	45.6%	8	13	8	17	100.0%	76.5%	2	12	11	28	18.2%	42.9%	37	35	11	20	13	14
SMU	        21	25	51	47	41.2%	53.2%	4	13	5	24	80.0%	54.2%	7	8	23	17	30.4%	47.1%	25	33	10	14	12	10
Umass Lowell	32	33	56	52	57.1%	63.5%	8	7	11	12	72.7%	58.3%	7	12	16	23	43.8%	52.2%	28	18	13	17	13	11
Stony Brook	28	22	50	58	56.0%	37.9%	7	20	10	24	70.0%	83.3%	7	8	13	28	53.8%	28.6%	31	30	14	13	19	10
UNH	        22	25	51	52	43.1%	48.1%	18	11	25	13	72.0%	84.6%	5	14	19	30	26.3%	46.7%	31	29	8	16	6	8
Vermont	        19	22	64	50	29.7%	44.0%	10	13	13	20	76.9%	65.0%	1	3	8	18	12.5%	16.7%	43	37	8	12	10	14
Stony Brook	21	23	52	48	40.4%	47.9%	20	19	23	24	87.0%	79.2%	3	7	10	18	30.0%	38.9%	29	31	12	8	13	14
Vermont	        21	23	42	52	50.0%	44.2%	1	10	2	13	50.0%	76.9%	7	6	13	22	53.8%	27.3%	24	27	11	9	14	4
																								
OOC L Tot.	138	148	319	336	43.3%	44.0%	53	63	68	97	77.9%	64.9%	22	57	90	148	24.4%	38.5%	182	205	67	92	90	65
AE L Tot.	143	148	315	312	45.4%	47.4%	64	80	84	106	76.2%	75.5%	30	50	79	139	38.0%	36.0%	186	172	66	75	75	61
																								
OOC L Avg.	23.0	24.7	53.2	56.0	43.3%	44.0%	8.8	10.5	11.3	16.2	77.9%	64.9%	3.7	9.5	15.0	24.7	24.4%	38.5%	30.3	34.2	11.2	15.3	15.0	10.8
AE L Avg.	23.8	24.7	52.5	52.0	45.4%	47.4%	10.7	13.3	14.0	17.7	76.2%	75.5%	5.0	8.3	13.2	23.2	38.0%	36.0%	31.0	28.7	11.0	12.5	12.5	10.2
																								
Total L	        281	296	634	648	44.3%	45.7%	117	143	152	203	77.0%	70.4%	52	107	169	287	30.8%	37.3%	368	377	133	167	165	126
Average L	23.4	24.7	52.8	54.0	43.4%	44.2%	9.8	11.9	12.7	16.9	81.0%	67.1%	4.3	8.9	14.1	23.9	21.5%	38.5%	30.7	31.4	11.1	13.9	13.8	10.5
																								
Total (all)	847	752	1797	1737	47.1%	43.3%	458	366	602	514	76.1%	71.2%	175	261	463	751	37.8%	34.8%	1138	937	415	410	377	374
Average (all)	26.5	23.5	56.2	54.3	47.3%	43.6%	14.3	11.4	18.8	16.1	75.8%	71.4%	5.5	8.2	14.5	23.5	37.2%	34.7%	35.6	29.3	13.0	12.8	11.8	11.7

Edited by Eli
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive said this multiple times but Nichols is a SOPHOMORE! Cremo is a SOPHOMORE who made All Conference team and still looks like a HS kid! Campbell is a SOPHOMORE! Have we ever had 2 Conference super stars and someone like Campbell all playing this well as Sophomores?? Obviously Jamar was a stud from day 1. Jon Iati played great from day one but that was due to a lack of talent around him in the early D1 days. I cant think of anytime we had 2-3 players playing at such a high level as sophs. I know Vermont is really deep but think building around David/Cremo/Campbell next two years going to be great! 40 points on 8 3s in his second tourney game??.

 

Back to this year. 100 points. 29 point win in round one. Team rallying around David (feels like 2015) Vermont very good (whatever year(s) we won up there. Starting to have a special feel to it. O yeah it's March. Will Brown does pretty well in March. Haha.

 

Trying to rally up the old roommates from UA and get to SB. When we beat them trying to get them to VT (or hopefully UA) great great win!!! Cant say enough about David!! These kids are amaZing!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot understand after all the success UA has had how the students have not come around. I graduated in 2004 & my friends made fun of me for following the team. But those same guys (all big sports fans) have made trips to tourney games with me. Was at the "Hooley" game. Philly for Duke couple others. I personally believe it's the schools fault for not marketing the TEAM more ! Not so much each individual game. People have plans. Pump the team up pre season. Give students season tix. Have eating/drinking events. Tailgate in the bubble. ANYTHING. Coach Brown & the players have done they job and had enough success. Just my two cents. Probably comes back to $$$ like anything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stats updated to include the post season. The number that jumped out to me that I had no idea about was our 25 assists! I know we had some great plays but, based on that number, it was a full 40 minute onslaught of teamwork. LOVE IT.

 

Also made it a tiny easier to glance at quickly for totals and averages.

UAlbany Wins																								
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																								
Opponent	FGM		FGA		FG%		FTM		FTA		FT%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		RBG		AST		TO	
Penn State	30	27	61	63	49.2%	42.9%	20	18	25	22	80.0%	81.8%	7	9	14	25	50.0%	36.0%	43	26	16	9	15	12
Oneonta	        38	20	81	71	46.9%	28.2%	16	11	25	13	64.0%	84.6%	5	5	12	27	41.7%	18.5%	69	31	15	11	12	13
Brown	        26	25	52	59	50.0%	42.4%	22	21	28	29	78.6%	72.4%	6	5	14	20	42.9%	25.0%	37	28	9	13	18	8
Siena	        27	23	52	49	51.9%	46.9%	21	19	32	25	65.6%	76.0%	6	7	12	22	50.0%	31.8%	29	31	15	11	6	11
Marist	        26	25	60	51	43.3%	49.0%	21	5	28	8	75.0%	62.5%	5	11	14	28	35.7%	39.3%	34	30	13	15	9	19
Colgate	        26	23	51	45	51.0%	51.1%	19	9	26	11	73.1%	81.8%	3	11	9	29	33.3%	37.9%	29	22	8	11	10	16
St. Francis BK	29	24	61	59	47.5%	40.7%	21	7	25	12	84.0%	58.3%	8	5	17	22	47.1%	22.7%	50	21	19	12	15	8
Columbia	21	24	52	51	40.4%	47.1%	24	12	28	18	85.7%	66.7%	4	7	12	23	33.3%	30.4%	39	27	8	16	15	13
Cornell	        27	22	62	49	43.5%	44.9%	11	5	16	9	68.8%	55.6%	4	10	16	31	25.0%	32.3%	43	24	14	14	10	13
UMBC	        28	16	54	49	51.9%	32.7%	16	10	20	15	80.0%	66.7%	5	11	8	27	62.5%	40.7%	41	26	8	11	11	13
Binghamton	35	22	54	48	64.8%	45.8%	7	13	11	14	63.6%	92.9%	7	8	12	24	58.3%	33.3%	26	22	17	12	8	13
Maine	        30	23	55	51	54.5%	45.1%	17	11	22	20	77.3%	55.0%	4	6	14	14	28.6%	42.9%	34	28	16	13	11	15
Hartford	25	19	55	55	45.5%	34.5%	19	11	27	16	70.4%	68.8%	5	12	14	36	35.7%	33.3%	44	29	11	14	13	13
Umass Lowell	32	30	61	58	52.5%	51.7%	19	10	24	13	79.2%	76.9%	7	7	13	17	53.8%	41.2%	33	30	20	15	10	14
UNH	        24	21	53	50	45.3%	42.0%	14	7	20	10	70.0%	70.0%	7	6	17	21	41.2%	28.6%	28	33	14	14	5	14
Binghamton	23	21	52	52	44.2%	40.4%	11	6	15	8	73.3%	75.0%	9	6	21	16	42.9%	37.5%	37	25	15	7	9	5
UMBC	        25	25	57	54	43.9%	46.3%	25	12	31	17	80.6%	70.6%	3	7	13	22	23.1%	31.8%	38	30	8	13	8	13
Maine	        29	17	70	51	41.4%	33.3%	8	13	10	23	80.0%	56.5%	8	9	23	19	34.8%	47.4%	40	36	15	10	3	9
Hartford	30	22	63	60	47.6%	36.7%	13	11	16	14	81.3%	78.6%	7	7	14	21	50.0%	33.3%	39	35	16	11	13	15
Hartford	35	27	57	64	61.4%	42.2%	17	12	21	14	81.0%	85.7%	13	5	25	20	52.0%	25.0%	37	26	25	11	11	11
																								
OOC W Tot.	250	213	532	497	47.0%	42.9%	175	107	233	147	75.1%	72.8%	48	70	120	227	40.0%	30.8%	373	240	117	112	110	113
AE W Tot.	281	216	574	528	49.0%	40.9%	149	104	196	150	76.0%	69.3%	62	79	149	217	41.6%	36.4%	360	294	140	120	91	124
AE Tour. Tot.	35	27	57	64	61.4%	42.2%	17	12	21	14	81.0%	85.7%	13	5	25	20	52.0%	25.0%	37	26	25	11	11	11
																								
OOC W Avg.	27.8	23.7	59.1	55.2	47.0%	42.9%	19.4	11.9	25.9	16.3	75.1%	72.8%	5.3	7.8	13.3	25.2	40.0%	30.8%	41.4	26.7	13.0	12.4	12.2	12.6
AE W Avg.	28.1	21.6	57.4	52.8	49.0%	40.9%	14.9	10.4	19.6	15.0	76.0%	69.3%	6.2	7.9	14.9	21.7	41.6%	36.4%	36	29.4	14.0	12.0	9.1	12.4
AE Tour. Avg.	35.0	27.0	57.0	64.0	61.4%	42.2%	17.0	12.0	21.0	14.0	81.0%	85.7%	13.0	5.0	25.0	20.0	52.0%	25.0%	37.0	26.0	25.0	11.0	11.0	11.0
																								
Total W	        566	456	1163	1089	48.7%	41.9%	341	223	450	311	75.8%	71.7%	123	154	294	464	41.8%	33.2%	770	560	282	243	212	248
Average W	28.3	22.8	58.2	54.5	48.8%	42.2%	17.1	11.2	22.5	15.6	75.6%	71.8%	6.2	7.7	14.7	23.2	42.1%	33.5%	38.5	28.0	14.1	12.2	10.6	12.4
																								
UAlbany Losses																								
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																								
Opponent	FGM		FGA		FG%		FTM		FTA		FT%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		RBG		AST		TO	
Cincinatti	20	28	48	61	41.7%	45.9%	9	13	14	20	64.3%	65.0%	2	5	14	21	14.3%	23.8%	33	34	8	16	22	10
Grand Canyon	27	29	59	69	45.8%	42.0%	15	14	21	21	71.4%	66.7%	8	10	21	24	38.1%	41.7%	36	33	10	15	13	9
Holy Cross	21	18	45	46	46.7%	39.1%	8	6	10	10	80.0%	60.0%	1	11	9	29	11.1%	37.9%	20	37	15	12	18	9
Yale	        22	22	50	56	44.0%	39.3%	9	4	10	5	90.0%	80.0%	2	11	12	29	16.7%	37.9%	31	33	13	15	12	13
Canisius	27	26	66	57	40.9%	45.6%	8	13	8	17	100.0%	76.5%	2	12	11	28	18.2%	42.9%	37	35	11	20	13	14
SMU	        21	25	51	47	41.2%	53.2%	4	13	5	24	80.0%	54.2%	7	8	23	17	30.4%	47.1%	25	33	10	14	12	10
Umass Lowell	32	33	56	52	57.1%	63.5%	8	7	11	12	72.7%	58.3%	7	12	16	23	43.8%	52.2%	28	18	13	17	13	11
Stony Brook	28	22	50	58	56.0%	37.9%	7	20	10	24	70.0%	83.3%	7	8	13	28	53.8%	28.6%	31	30	14	13	19	10
UNH	        22	25	51	52	43.1%	48.1%	18	11	25	13	72.0%	84.6%	5	14	19	30	26.3%	46.7%	31	29	8	16	6	8
Vermont	        19	22	64	50	29.7%	44.0%	10	13	13	20	76.9%	65.0%	1	3	8	18	12.5%	16.7%	43	37	8	12	10	14
Stony Brook	21	23	52	48	40.4%	47.9%	20	19	23	24	87.0%	79.2%	3	7	10	18	30.0%	38.9%	29	31	12	8	13	14
Vermont	        21	23	42	52	50.0%	44.2%	1	10	2	13	50.0%	76.9%	7	6	13	22	53.8%	27.3%	24	27	11	9	14	4
																								
OOC L Tot.	138	148	319	336	43.3%	44.0%	53	63	68	97	77.9%	64.9%	22	57	90	148	24.4%	38.5%	182	205	67	92	90	65
AE L Tot.	143	148	315	312	45.4%	47.4%	64	80	84	106	76.2%	75.5%	30	50	79	139	38.0%	36.0%	186	172	66	75	75	61
																								
OOC L Avg.	23.0	24.7	53.2	56.0	43.3%	44.0%	8.8	10.5	11.3	16.2	77.9%	64.9%	3.7	9.5	15.0	24.7	24.4%	38.5%	30.3	34.2	11.2	15.3	15.0	10.8
AE L Avg.	23.8	24.7	52.5	52.0	45.4%	47.4%	10.7	13.3	14.0	17.7	76.2%	75.5%	5.0	8.3	13.2	23.2	38.0%	36.0%	31.0	28.7	11.0	12.5	12.5	10.2
																								
Total L	        281	296	634	648	44.3%	45.7%	117	143	152	203	77.0%	70.4%	52	107	169	287	30.8%	37.3%	368	377	133	167	165	126
Average L	23.4	24.7	52.8	54.0	43.4%	44.2%	9.8	11.9	12.7	16.9	81.0%	67.1%	4.3	8.9	14.1	23.9	21.5%	38.5%	30.7	31.4	11.1	13.9	13.8	10.5
																								
Total (all)	847	752	1797	1737	47.1%	43.3%	458	366	602	514	76.1%	71.2%	175	261	463	751	37.8%	34.8%	1138	937	415	410	377	374
Average (all)	26.5	23.5	56.2	54.3	47.3%	43.6%	14.3	11.4	18.8	16.1	75.8%	71.4%	5.5	8.2	14.5	23.5	37.2%	34.7%	35.6	29.3	13.0	12.8	11.8	11.7

Cremo had the all time assist record in a game too. Edited by MRSGDG
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

That attendance seems very low... Not sure I agree. Seems to me like 2400 people.

How was attendance at the other 3 sites ?

Good enough to get me a tournament back?

I hope Albany just gave away the tickets. Profiting $3 on processing fees means squat.
Conference might not allow them to give them away.
Pshh, what the America east don't know won't hurt em lol
Link to post
Share on other sites

The student sections looked pretty full to me. Crowd looked bigger than the announced attendance. Crowd was definitely into the game. Very happy for David.

 

The section by the main entrance (University Gym side) was probably 85% full. The section by the SEFCU lot was probably 30% full.

Edited by Eli
Link to post
Share on other sites

1473 at UNH, 2750 at Stony Brook. 3266 sellout in Vermont

Counting UA that's about 9500 tickets sold for the quarterfinals. If that was first day of the tourney they wouldn't have sold nearly as many. As much as I hate it, it's more money for the conference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

1473 at UNH, 2750 at Stony Brook. 3266 sellout in Vermont

Counting UA that's about 9500 tickets sold for the quarterfinals. If that was first day of the tourney they wouldn't have sold nearly as many. As much as I hate it, it's more money for the conference.
I get that, but why should we care if the conference makes money???
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

1473 at UNH, 2750 at Stony Brook. 3266 sellout in Vermont

Counting UA that's about 9500 tickets sold for the quarterfinals. If that was first day of the tourney they wouldn't have sold nearly as many. As much as I hate it, it's more money for the conference.
I get that, but why should we care if the conference makes money???

 

 

I don't care if the conference makes money and I've posted MANY times about how the conference has shown over and over again that they don't give a $iena about the fans. My post was to show why THEY wanted this change. Maybe if they sold out every session at the one location tourney format they wouldn't have changed but I don't think anything other than the finals sold out. Maybe the semis when it was at Albany those couple years.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

1473 at UNH, 2750 at Stony Brook. 3266 sellout in Vermont

Counting UA that's about 9500 tickets sold for the quarterfinals. If that was first day of the tourney they wouldn't have sold nearly as many. As much as I hate it, it's more money for the conference.
I get that, but why should we care if the conference makes money???

I don't care if the conference makes money and I've posted MANY times about how the conference has shown over and over again that they don't give a $iena about the fans. My post was to show why THEY wanted this change. Maybe if they sold out every session at the one location tourney format they wouldn't have changed but I don't think anything other than the finals sold out. Maybe the semis when it was at Albany those couple years.

Haha I know, was only kidding. We are both on the same page with the conference.

 

Only good thing they've ever done was getting the espn3 contract.

Edited by UA'08
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...