Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

[MBB] Game #20: 1/23/19 - 7:00PM vs Stony Brook


Eli
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, UA1882 said:

Clark did not play well but he had 13 points , 5 rb, and 6 assists. That is not a bad game. I will not waste my breath on what our senior leader did. 

Please... Can we all agree that one game doesn't make a season but how you gonna justify Campbell over de Sousa if he keeps defending and playing like this? We'll see if he can... But tonight was an eye opener for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not giving up on Clark. He did seem off tonight though. Didn't see the normal ultra hustle I have been seeing from him all season. This was a tough tough loss. Especially with Lulka wide open underneath as the ball was fumbled at the end.

Just curious what Clark has done to the officials. Does he trash talk and complain? He almost never gets calls. He pushes to the rim, gets raped, and no call. Everytime.

Edited by godanesgo99
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2019 at 12:37 PM, godanesgo99 said:

This will be a break out game for one of the players that haven't contributed much so far. I'm thinking deSousa gets more minutes and makes the most of it. SBU is supposedly the most athletic team in the league, and deSousa fits that bill.

Just my uninformed guess. UA loses, but it's a much closer game than SBU thinks it will be.

I guess I got one right this time, lol. Wish I was wrong and it ended with a W though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, godanesgo99 said:

I'm not giving up on Clark. He didn't seem off tonight though. Didn't see the normal ultra hustle I have been seeing from him all season. This was a tough tough loss. Especially with Lulka wide open underneath as the ball was fumbled at the end.

Just curious what Clark has done to the officials. Does he trash talk and complain? He almost never gets calls. He pushes to the rim, gets raped, and no call. Everytime.

When you go in sideways twisting left and right while falling you’ll never get a call. He attacks the rim well, but doesn’t go up strong. 

Edited by UA'08
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UAlbany Wins																																			
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																			
Opponent	Type	LOC	ATN	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		REB		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Canisius	OOC	Away	1540	75	66	25	23	47	60	53.2%	38.3%	8	6	18	30	44.4%	20.0%	17	14	25	25	68.0%	56.0%	37	32	17	12	5	11	1	2	18	8	19	24
Oneonta		OOC	Home	1659	79	62	30	24	63	62	47.6%	38.7%	7	9	22	24	31.8%	37.5%	12	5	16	8	75.0%	62.5%	45	32	14	16	8	9	2	6	17	19	13	20
Monmouth	OOC	Home	1902	82	63	21	24	46	60	45.7%	40.0%	14	5	29	20	48.3%	25.0%	26	10	30	19	86.7%	52.6%	27	40	15	10	7	7	4	1	16	18	19	24
Manhattan	OOC	Home	1412	77	67	20	27	40	58	50.0%	46.6%	9	6	20	18	45.0%	33.3%	28	7	35	13	80.0%	53.8%	33	24	16	18	7	11	4	2	19	13	18	27
Niagara		OOC	Away	829	79	74	29	22	64	60	45.3%	36.7%	10	8	28	22	35.7%	36.4%	11	22	13	30	84.6%	73.3%	40	37	13	8	6	4	0	6	12	8	22	17
																																		
Tot. W				7342	392	332	125	120	260	300	48.1%	40.0%	48	34	117	114	41.0%	29.8%	94	58	119	95	79.0%	61.1%	182	165	75	64	33	42	11	17	82	66	91	112
Avg. W				1468.4	78.4	66.4	25.0	24.0	52.0	60.0	48.4%	40.1%	9.6	6.8	23.4	22.8	41.1%	30.4%	18.8	11.6	23.8	19.0	78.9%	59.7%	36.4	33.0	15.0	12.8	6.6	8.4	2.2	3.4	16.4	13.2	18.2	22.4
																																			
UAlbany Losses																																			
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																			
Opponent	Type	LOC	ATN	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		REB		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Iona		OOC	Away	1871	68	72	21	25	58	57	36.2%	43.9%	11	6	24	25	45.8%	24.0%	15	16	16	25	93.8%	64.0%	39	34	10	16	0	12	0	2	22	13	20	16
Boston Univ.	OOC	Home	2579	61	71	20	28	59	55	33.9%	50.9%	5	10	20	22	25.0%	45.5%	16	5	22	11	72.7%	45.5%	33	40	14	18	7	3	3	4	8	14	13	21
Holy Cross	OOC	Home	1614	65	69	23	26	63	56	36.5%	46.4%	10	5	28	17	35.7%	29.4%	9	12	14	20	64.3%	60.0%	45	32	16	18	5	6	1	7	15	9	22	12
UW-Milwaukee	OOC	Away	952	70	79	23	31	59	53	39.0%	58.5%	10	12	30	21	33.3%	57.1%	14	5	17	7	82.4%	71.4%	28	32	12	19	7	1	2	4	8	12	9	14
LIU Brooklyn	OOC	Neutral	-	77	80	25	26	56	63	44.6%	41.3%	6	11	22	28	27.3%	39.3%	21	17	27	22	77.8%	77.3%	42	32	10	13	6	10	5	6	26	16	24	21
Dartmouth	OOC	Neutral	-	77	91	26	30	61	57	42.6%	52.6%	6	17	22	33	27.3%	51.5%	19	14	23	21	82.6%	66.7%	30	37	11	21	8	6	0	4	11	15	16	21
Yale		OOC	Away	904	63	71	23	29	60	54	38.3%	53.7%	8	4	26	14	30.8%	28.6%	9	9	13	22	69.2%	40.9%	32	40	15	19	6	4	1	2	11	13	19	16
Dartmouth	OOC	Home	1740	52	61	18	22	60	53	30.0%	41.5%	8	7	24	24	33.3%	29.2%	8	10	14	16	57.1%	62.5%	32	45	7	15	4	1	2	4	5	11	16	18
Providence	OOC	Away	4855	43	73	15	24	50	57	30.0%	42.1%	6	6	25	18	24.0%	33.3%	7	19	13	24	53.8%	79.2%	31	42	5	12	6	9	2	4	22	14	27	17
Kent State	OOC	Away	2114	68	70	24	24	53	60	45.3%	40.0%	8	6	23	22	34.8%	27.3%	12	16	15	20	80.0%	80.0%	39	28	9	10	2	10	3	5	17	6	18	15
Vermont		AE	Home	2733	51	80	19	31	54	57	35.2%	54.4%	5	10	21	26	23.8%	38.5%	8	8	11	13	72.7%	61.5%	26	39	10	17	9	5	2	4	12	12	16	15
Maine		AE	Home	1793	62	66	20	22	49	51	40.8%	43.1%	11	12	30	28	36.7%	42.9%	11	10	20	13	55.0%	76.9%	33	30	13	17	6	10	1	5	14	12	15	16
Umass-Lowell	AE	Away	411	72	84	27	31	55	53	49.1%	58.5%	8	8	22	19	36.4%	42.1%	8	14	9	16	88.9%	87.5%	25	28	12	14	4	3	1	3	13	9	18	17
UMBC		AE	Away	1659	64	65	21	24	52	56	40.4%	42.9%	10	6	29	18	34.5%	33.3%	12	11	17	15	70.6%	73.3%	37	31	12	9	4	7	1	1	14	10	19	18
Stony Brook	AE	Home	2316	66	67	23	26	67	62	34.3%	41.9%	8	7	31	22	25.8%	31.8%	12	8	16	14	75.0%	57.1%	44	40	19	12	7	5	4	6	9	13	14	13
																																			
Tot. L	OOC			16629	644	737	218	265	579	565	37.7%	46.9%	78	84	244	224	32.0%	37.5%	130	123	174	188	74.7%	65.4%	351	362	109	161	51	62	19	42	145	123	184	171
	AE			8912	315	362	110	134	277	279	39.7%	48.0%	42	43	133	113	31.6%	38.1%	51	51	73	71	69.9%	71.8%	165	168	66	69	30	30	9	19	62	56	82	79
																																			
Avg. L	OOC			1662.9	64.4	73.7	21.8	26.5	57.9	56.5	37.7%	46.9%	7.8	8.4	24.4	22.4	32.0%	37.5%	13.0	12.3	17.4	18.8	74.7%	65.4%	35.1	36.2	10.9	16.1	5.1	6.2	1.9	4.2	14.5	12.3	18.4	17.1
	AE			1782.4	63.0	72.4	22.0	26.8	55.4	55.8	39.7%	48.0%	8.4	8.6	26.6	22.6	31.6%	38.1%	10.2	10.2	14.6	14.2	69.9%	71.8%	33.0	33.6	13.2	13.8	6.0	6.0	1.8	3.8	12.4	11.2	16.4	15.8
																																			
Tot. L				25541	959	1099	328	399	856	844	38.3%	47.3%	120	127	377	337	31.8%	37.7%	181	174	247	259	73.3%	67.2%	516	530	175	230	81	92	28	61	207	179	266	250
Avg. L				1702.7	63.9	73.3	21.9	26.6	57.1	56.3	38.4%	47.4%	8.0	8.5	25.1	22.5	31.6%	36.9%	12.1	11.6	16.5	17.3	73.1%	66.9%	34.4	35.3	11.7	15.3	5.4	6.1	1.9	4.1	13.8	11.9	17.7	16.7
																																			
Tot. (all)			32883	1351	1431	453	519	1116	1144	40.6%	45.4%	168	161	494	451	34.0%	35.7%	275	232	366	354	75.1%	65.5%	698	695	250	294	114	134	39	78	289	245	357	362
Avg. (all)			1644.2	67.6	71.6	22.7	26.0	55.8	57.2	40.9%	45.6%	8.4	8.1	24.7	22.6	34.0%	35.3%	13.8	11.6	18.3	17.7	74.5%	65.1%	34.9	34.8	12.5	14.7	5.7	6.7	2.0	3.9	14.5	12.3	17.9	18.1
			LOC	ATN	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		REB		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly enough, I wasn't as impressed with SBU as I thought I would be considering the hype. I didn't think we played particularly well and still stayed with them. Easily could have won. With UMBC beating UVM, the league doesn't look as daunting as it did 4 hours ago.

Very soon it will click and the team will figure out how to put one in the W column. Hopefully it is soon enough to make the AE playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team is improving. Tough loss but great game and effort. I love seeing Campbell and Miller out there (De Sousa too). All the guys played great tonight. Defense, both individual and team, is improving. Even though we lost, and I feel sick for these kids, they are about to turn the corner. Keep throwing punches! We just lost to SB and UMBC in the final overtime seconds. The America East better respect us. A year or two from now this team will be tough to beat in conference. 

Edited by UA_MA_2000
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UA_MA_2000 said:

This team is improving. Tough loss but great game and effort. I love seeing Campbell and Miller out there. All the guys played great tonight. Defense, both individual and team, is improving. Even though we lost, and I feel sick for these kids, they are about to turn the corner. Keep throwing punches! We just lost to SB and UMBC in the final overtime seconds. The America East better respect us ... .

I think you mean De Sousa. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UA_MA_2000 said:

Both of them. I have no qualms with Campbell. 

I know I'm in the minority . But I think Clark being a Jr, and bringing in no guards as of right now next season, we need him. He needs to continue to play . Campbell on the other hand needs to take a seat at the end of the bench.  He is a senior, will not be back next year and we need to develope De Sousa. Campbell went 1-6 , 4 rebs, and 1 assist in 32 mins .  He has done that most of the season . That is the definition of a qualm sir... lol ... jk...  needs to sit. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, UA'08 said:

Play everyone I don’t care, but when someone is hot or a lineup is working, keep it it friggin going.

This. With Miller in the lineup with the 4 freshmen, we were doing great. Then we put in Clark and things came to a screeching halt. Same thing happened last game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, UA1882 said:

I know I'm in the minority . But I think Clark being a Jr, and bringing in no guards as of right now next season, we need him. He needs to continue to play . Campbell on the other hand needs to take a seat at the end of the bench.  He is a senior, will not be back next year and we need to develope De Sousa. Campbell went 1-6 , 4 rebs, and 1 assist in 32 mins .  He has done that most of the season . That is the definition of a qualm sir... lol ... jk...  needs to sit. 

I'd sit Clark before Campbell. At least the latter can hold his own physically and not turn the ball over. I'm tired of dropped balls, errant play, and soft basketball. Everytime Clark has the ball in crunch time, I am on edge fearing a turnover. Why is that?

Totally agree with the shift in the game when Miller was benched and SB started clawing back.

Edited by UA_MA_2000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...