Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

Recommended Posts

Last Up: L (74-66) @ Vermont
Next Up: @ St. Josephs (0-8)
Time/Date: 1/9/21 @ 6:00PM
TV/Streaming: NBCSN
Local Radio: ESPN Radio 104.5 FM
ESPN Matchup Predictor: N/A

UAlbany Wins																																			
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																			
Opponent	Type	LOC	ATN	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		REB		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
Vermont		AE	Away	-	63	62	23	23	49	58	46.9%	39.7%	5	10	18	29	27.8%	34.5%	12	6	20	9	60.0%	66.7%	30	33	9	14	7	3	3	4	13	14	17	18
																																			
Tot. W				0	63	62	23	23	49	58	46.9%	39.7%	5	10	18	29	27.8%	34.5%	12	6	20	9	60.0%	66.7%	30	33	9	14	7	3	3	4	13	14	17	18
Avg. W				0.0	63.0	62.0	23.0	23.0	49.0	58.0	46.9%	39.7%	5.0	10.0	18.0	29.0	27.8%	34.5%	12.0	6.0	20.0	9.0	60.0%	66.7%	30.0	33.0	9.0	14.0	7.0	3.0	3.0	4.0	13.0	14.0	17.0	18.0
																																			
UAlbany Losses																																			
** Albany stats are the left side in each grouping **																																			
Opponent	Type	LOC	ATN	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		REB		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	
UMBC		AE	Home	-	64	65	24	23	62	53	38.7%	43.4%	6	8	19	21	31.6%	38.1%	10	11	13	20	76.9%	55.0%	28	39	14	13	4	6	2	1	9	15	18	18
UMBC		AE	Home	-	60	65	20	20	62	47	32.3%	42.6%	6	7	22	18	27.3%	38.9%	14	18	19	29	73.7%	62.1%	29	36	9	10	6	2	2	7	11	17	23	18
Niagara		OOC	Home	-	65	70	24	25	50	50	48.0%	50.0%	9	6	20	17	45.0%	35.3%	8	14	14	14	57.1%	100.0%	23	24	16	12	5	4	0	4	11	10	15	15
Vermont		AE	Away	-	66	74	24	24	53	52	45.3%	46.2%	10	8	23	21	43.5%	38.1%	8	18	13	22	61.5%	81.8%	22	33	12	15	4	4	1	3	13	15	20	18
																																			
Tot. L		OOC		0	65	70	24	25	50	50	48.0%	50.0%	9	6	20	17	45.0%	35.3%	8	14	14	14	57.1%	100.0%	23	24	16	12	5	4	0	4	11	10	15	15
		AE		0	190	204	68	67	177	152	38.4%	44.1%	22	23	64	60	34.4%	38.3%	32	47	45	71	71.1%	66.2%	79	108	35	38	14	12	5	11	33	47	61	54
																																			
Avg. L		OOC		0.0	65.0	70.0	24.0	25.0	50.0	50.0	48.0%	50.0%	9.0	6.0	20.0	17.0	45.0%	35.3%	8.0	14.0	14.0	14.0	57.1%	100.0%	23.0	24.0	16.0	12.0	5.0	4.0	0.0	4.0	11.0	10.0	15.0	15.0
		AE		0.0	63.3	68.0	22.7	22.3	59.0	50.7	38.4%	44.1%	7.3	7.7	21.3	20.0	34.4%	38.3%	10.7	15.7	15.0	23.7	71.1%	66.2%	26.3	36.0	11.7	12.7	4.7	4.0	1.7	3.7	11.0	15.7	20.3	18.0
																																			
Tot. L				0	255	274	92	92	227	202	40.5%	45.5%	31	29	84	77	36.9%	37.7%	40	61	59	85	67.8%	71.8%	102	132	51	50	19	16	5	15	44	57	76	69
Avg. L				0.0	63.8	68.5	23.0	23.0	56.8	50.5	41.1%	45.5%	7.8	7.3	21.0	19.3	36.8%	37.6%	10.0	15.3	14.8	21.3	67.3%	74.7%	25.5	33.0	12.8	12.5	4.8	4.0	1.3	3.8	11.0	14.3	19.0	17.3
																																			
Tot. (all)			0	318	336	115	115	276	260	41.7%	44.2%	36	39	102	106	35.3%	36.8%	52	67	79	94	65.8%	71.3%	132	165	60	64	26	19	8	19	57	71	93	87
Avg. (all)			0.0	63.6	67.2	23.0	23.0	55.2	52.0	42.2%	44.4%	7.2	7.8	20.4	21.2	35.0%	37.0%	10.4	13.4	15.8	18.8	65.9%	73.1%	26.4	33.0	12.0	12.8	5.2	3.8	1.6	3.8	11.4	14.2	18.6	17.4
			LOC	ATN	PTS		FGM		FGA		FG%		3PTM		3PTA		3PT%		FTM		FTA		FT%		REB		AST		STL		BLK		TO		FOUL	

 

Edited by Eli
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

This is a program that has been a in trouble for a while. Over the last few years I've been very vocal in my disappointment. Now I can't even work up the anger to light myself on fire here. Let's

Don't care if we ever play them again. I would travel to see the Great Danes play in any of the 50 states before I would travel 8 miles to see LCC play. 

I am a long time, avid supporter of this team, this coach, and this program.....so let me say what we are all hesitant to say: This team is bad and almost unwatchable; there are probably 3 decent

Posted Images

This thread may change if we replace the SBU games with some OOC games. Otherwise, NJIT on the 16th is our next game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand Healy and Luka are injured and may be for a while. But what the heck is the matter with Hutch. Showed a lot  of promise last year {a little inconsistent @ times, but for a freshman, I really thought we had something may be even a star in the making??} Shafer reported as the "BEST" player in practice. Is it nerves, he like Hutch seems totally lost when on the floor. And JoJo played only 8 minutes yesterday. Counting Healy & Luka that is what many predicted could be UA's starting five this year???????  Also, for a team that has only played 4 games, WHY are we SO beat up. Brown must be killing (just kidding) these guys in practice.

Anyhow, looking for thoughts and opinions:  Will any of the 2019-2020 roster come around?? Or is what we saw yesterday all there is???

re-printed from vermont entry. Still looking for thoughts/opinions. Is this team what we saw in the second half Saturday and the first half Sunday? Is there any HELP on the way?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DanesRGood said:

Been out of the loop a bit.  When did the SBU games get postponed?  I take it that it's covid related?

It's Covid. Everything is Covid. I think they announced it about a week ago. SBU missed last weekends games and this weekend against us.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/4/2021 at 9:42 AM, dslyank said:

 

I understand Healy and Luka are injured and may be for a while. But what the heck is the matter with Hutch. Showed a lot  of promise last year {a little inconsistent @ times, but for a freshman, I really thought we had something may be even a star in the making??} Shafer reported as the "BEST" player in practice. Is it nerves, he like Hutch seems totally lost when on the floor. And JoJo played only 8 minutes yesterday. Counting Healy & Luka that is what many predicted could be UA's starting five this year???????  Also, for a team that has only played 4 games, WHY are we SO beat up. Brown must be killing (just kidding) these guys in practice.

 

I think it's more of a numbers game with Hutch. The way CJ Kelly is playing there aren't many minutes at the SF spot. To me, Shafer is a more natural at the backup SF spot since he's a little quicker. I honestly like Hutch off the bench at the PF spot since he can hit some shots and open up the floor.

I thought Chuck Champion played better this weekend and took minutes away from Jojo Anderson. Between those two and Horton, that's a lot of competition for PG minutes.

Lulka has been a big loss because it's the spot we can least afford to lose a guy. I'm really puzzled why we went really small against Vermont instead of playing Hank for at least a few minutes. 

I will welcome Healy back when he's healthy. I know he's a great shooter but honestly Rizzzuto is looking like the better player.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, UA'08 said:

Can’t find anyone to play with this 2 week gap? I can’t believe the two local D1s can’t even agree to play each other  just to get games in.

There may have been discussions.... however; the concessions to make that happen are a steep hill to climb in short period of time....

Edited by cwdickens
correction
Link to post
Share on other sites

With no fans, what kind of concessions are need to be made? Hell, could do a home and home for 2 games in a week. No travel concerns, not piece of the gate to discuss. Seems purely ego issues on both sides.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WB essentially said in one of the articles after the Vermont games that he would prefer to get the team healthy to forcing an additional game on the schedule. I'm guessing that across the board, most teams will be prioritizing making certain their conference games happen to adding non-conference games

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can’t see how not playing for 2 weeks is more of a benefit than getting actual games in. It’s a lost season anyway, I’m sure these seniors just want to play other teams instead of 2 weeks beating each other up at practice, in which most case is where all the injuries have come from.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

With COVID -19 testing rates over 10% in the greater Capital District, less games will result in more games in the end.  ..... editing after seeing updates below: "Sometimes S____ happens and your  wrong"  Interesting to see who opponent is...

Edited by cwdickens
update
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Eli changed the title to Game #6: 1/9/21 - 6:00PM vs St. Josephs

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...