Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

kikuria

Big Purple Fans
  • Posts

    219
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by kikuria

  1. On 4/1/2024 at 2:59 PM, B9j2j6s said:

    Hope it works out for both.  I can only go off what was being communicated in the emails.  It seemed positive to me because of the equipment that the AD were buying for the team.   As a club member we were using weights made of paint cans and metal pipes, our rowing machines were ancient concept 2 model b's and my freshman year boat that I learned on was made of wood.  Think the type you see at a TGI Friday's hanging on the walls.  

    The rowing team in the club Era had many many ups and downs.  So not surprised some UA alumni would be hesitant to help with the start of the D1 Era.  Sorry if this sounds like a Taylor Swift tour. 

    For those unaware the D3 Era ended appox 1994.  Here is what the team looked like back then.

    https://www.row2k.com/video/-quot-Albany-39-s-Rowing-Revival-quot--original-airdate-July-1988-on-WMHT-Channel-17-Albany-NY/29306/

    Then the club Era was after we got dropped from the AD.  We got our funding from the Student Association and dues that the rowers would pay. During this time the team was student run with a coach being hired but all the choices were made by the eboard which was made up of members of the rowing team.  Recruiting was only on campus and we often had large Novic or beginning rower teams.  The major problem was students would lose interest when after the first year with a 430pm practice time they would have to switch to the Varsity team which had 530am practices.  This made it hard to grow the team, coaches often wouldn't stay for more than a year, and we didn't have the money to upgrade equipment.  

    There was also a time when SA dropped the club and they were competing under the Friends of Albany Crew.  Not sure what happened during this time period (appox late 2010's to Covid) or what ultimately sank the Friends of Albany Crew, but that is the very short history of the Rowing Team at UA. 

    I am sure I am leaving a lot of historical details out.  If anyone knows anything more please feel free to add.  I know I said this before, glad to see UA back on the water.  Hope we are back to stay.  Rowing and Pep Band were the two activities that made a large University seem smaller and made it feel like home for 4 years.

    Not precisely.  I went down a rabbit hole years ago and spent way too much time researching this (my wife will never forgive me.) 

    The program was always technically a "club" but that meant something different when it was founded in 1984. Club Sports then were generally sports the University would track towards varsity-status. Direct support from the Athletic Department ended in 1991 though the team maintained informal support.  It's unclear why the school never formalized varsity-status.

     
    Based on some of the documents I tracked down, it appears that the University made the decision in roughly 1990/1991 to begin elevating athletics in terms of divisions.  The school moved to Division 2 in 1995 before the subsequent move to Division 1.
     
    It's important to understand that there wasn't a profound distinction in rowing in the 1980's and early 1990's.  No one was well funded so clubs could make a run at it. The biggest distinction was whether or not you had a paid coach. Which was a consequence of 100 years worth of alumni to draw from.
     
    The program moved into the student government oversight  era during the 1991/1992 school year and it appears to have been a scramble to survive.  There was a solid group of seniors that made it work.  But 20 years old's don't plan the way a Department does (longer term.)  The teams had ups and downs typical of club programs. Ups coincided with having a coach of reasonable caliber.  Downs tended to occur when it was heavily "student run" (student run clubs can't hold a candle to ones with professional leadership - no matter how hard one tries.) 
     
    There was always an occasional crew that would do well but very little programmatic stability and success.  It would be like Track and Field having the occasional athlete in a particular event do well rather than the success it has had across many events with a wide range of athletes over a long period (not a perfect analogy.)
  2. On 12/14/2023 at 9:31 AM, dslyank said:

    Kikuria any thoughts/opinion on new coach? His BIO looks very impressive. Of course, I respect your privacy if you do not wish to respond or have no opinion.

    Family obligations have kept me offline and I come back to lots of new stuff.  My two cents - Chris Chase is a good fit.  The challenges with "starting up" aren't the same as coming into a fully established program where you're maximizing what you already have and look to extend it. He's got deep relationships in the rowing community and should be able to leverage that into a recruiting advantage.

    I'm sure there will be growing pains. As long as he has enough resources (doesn't need to be the most, but does need to be enough) and is given the time to build, UAlbany has some real advantages that have been overlooked for decades. I always believed if you built it, people would come. I say that from a place of optimism while trying to be brutally objective.

    • Like 2
  3. 8 hours ago, Dane96 said:

    Agreed.  Was discussing this a few CAA folks. Most of NU’s meets are local.  Albany has enough comp to not have to leave New England and MAAC territory.  So to be attached to the CAA just for the championship may not be a necessary thing.  They said, I think the MAAC has 10 schools. Not sure if adding another is too many for them. 

    Last I checked there were 7 or 8 MAAC schools sponsoring women's rowing.  May have the details a bit off though.

  4. On 5/22/2023 at 11:33 AM, classof95 said:

    I ran into an Albany alum who owned a store (his sweatshirt gave it away) this weekend and we talked a bit about the state of the university and athletics. He is pretty involved still as an alum but is losing interest year by year. Said that he has had a few conversations with President Rodriguez about concern over losing ground to the other major SUNYs, both in academics and athletics. Said the degree was far more prestigious back in the 90s than it is now. Rodriguez apparently said that they're less concerned with US News rankings and more with making the university accessible to as many students as possible. I like the latter idea but I'm not sure it precludes the former. Has anyone else heard similar sentiments from the administration?

    Yes.  They've decided to run the University as a social service agency rather than a center of excellence.  They use different words but the meaning is clear.

    • Confused 1
  5. On 4/18/2023 at 3:02 PM, Eli said:

    Yep. School completely blew it after the MBB/WBB championship years (didn't give Brown the tools he needed to continue) and the #1 LAX years (don't really follow LAX so not sure why that happened). Instead, they renewed an FBB coach that is a total loser on and off the field (total prick if you ask me) like 3 times, yadda yadda yadda.

    One day we'll fire Benson, Cegles, Gattuso, Killings, etc. and start a new...that's when I'll be back to talking about UA publicly in a positive light and giving them money on a yearly basis. Until then, I won't give them a dime outside of coming for the arena home opener (50/50 chance), I'll continue to trash members of the leadership team (aforementioned) on social media and anytime the school calls me begging for donations I'll tell them to fire those clowns otherwise to stop calling. Don't care if they are an innocent student calling or someone from the AD. You want my money? Make changes. Starting at the top.

    New arena and newer stadium is just lipstick on the pig.

    And the Office of Civil Rights/Department of Education still haven't blessed the school declaring it in Title IX compliance.  Self-inflicted wounds over and over again (like all the staffing choices you listed.)

    • Like 2
  6. On 8/1/2021 at 1:11 PM, dslyank said:

    Article about TITLE IX front page of TU today. Interviewed people at St Rose and lcc. Article mostly about covid and financial loses to Athletic departments and especially how that effected woman sports. Interesting comment from lcc:  "At her former school, Siena also said it has no plans to ax teams. Athletic director John D’Argenio said sports help drive enrollment with so many athletes outside of the basketball programs paying at least some of their own way."  Curious lcc currently running an add on TV claiming lcc guarantees all applicants a $57,000 scholarship. Then their athletic director claims most student athletes pay at least some of their way. Don't think that computes; but I never really believe any of the garbage that come out of the school. The article goes on to say how St.Rose and especially lcc & D'Argenio have built up their opportunities for women over the years; but fails to reveal their current TITLE IX statuses??

    But I digress; what is most interesting, UA the largest school in the area is NOT mentioned or interviewed at all. Probably a very good thing UA not interviewed????????????

     

    Thinking it's a business decision by the Times Union.  UA athletics has been pouring advertising dollars towards the TU over the last few years.  That kind of coverage kills the golden goose.   UAlbany  has many former TU staffers working for them now.  Piss off the school with your coverage, sport reporters won't get access to the locker room or and beat reporters will get less access to on campus people.  That's how the game is played and both sides know it.

  7. On 7/10/2021 at 11:56 AM, dslyank said:

    A fine IMHO is the least of UA's problems. Typically, the men's program will be forced to reduce the # of scholarships they can offer to bring it inline with the women's number of scholies. Could also be a penalty faze where the men may be required to have a LESS scholarship ratio for a period of time This means cutting programs OR playing handicapped with less scholar athletes for men. The alternative is of course adding women's programs; but $,$$$,$$$,$$$ you can guess how likely of that happening. 

    I am sorry to sound like a doom sayer. This is all speculation on my part; but I'm guessing the NCAA was waiting or hoping the courts would bale them out. Now they HAVE to do something?? They cannot simply IGNORE a TTTLE IX violation indefinitely.

    Anyone like to add anything or disagree. PLEASE DO SO! Loved to be wrong about all of this.

     
    It's interesting that the court made clear that they are NOT saying the University is in compliance with Title IX  (seemingly acknowledging they are not.)  The optics aren't good when trying to recruit.  Female high school athletes think 2x about coming to Albany just making the problem worse.
     
    I also looked at the reported enrollment numbers. Looks to be nearly 500 more women now than men. It's been a few years but the last time I looked those numbers the school was nearly even and sometimes even had more males enrolled.  That's a big shift in a short period.  
     
    If enrollment is changing that dramatically, how does the school get into compliance?!! 
     
    EDIT:  520 more women than men as of June 30, 2020 report.
  8. Reading the article and the trying to get through the ruling.  Basis of the dismissal appears to be because the school has current agreement with the Office of Civil Rights. And court doesn't want to step in while in effect? Am I reading that correctly?

    What happens if school doesn't meet the deadline?

    Note:  Notwithstanding my love for rowing and previous advocacy for the addition of Women's Crew, I recognize that ship sailed (or rowed) long ago. Bummer but reality sets in at some point.

  9. 14 minutes ago, GreatDanes06 said:

    I mean I remember when I worked for the AD for a year as a student facilities person, I remember that thing was seldom used. I knew they had some kid classes there, but most of the time I never saw it being used to a high level.

    I'm definitely older than you!  Probably dating myself to some degree but there used to be a ton of PE classes including swimming classes (I took one. Great 1 credit class.)  There was a swimming (and diving?) team too.  I don't know if there is a local market for pool rentals though. 

  10. 3 hours ago, Clickclack said:

    Like you, I believe the same but realistically we are probably another 3-5 years out which is sad. 

     

    2 hours ago, B9j2j6s said:

    Based on the size of the PE building reno I would say 3 to 5 years is about right.  We will get there.

     

    Did I read correctly that they are getting rid of the pool? Or are renovations in the works for it too?

  11. 17 hours ago, DanesRGood said:

    I don't think it was feasible and still don't.  We don't have the money, support from the alumni, support from the university or support from the state to make it work. It's sad really. 

    I agreed insomuch as it only works when it's a budget priority.  It does not appear to be.

×
×
  • Create New...