Jump to content



UAlbany Athletics- America East-
SOCIAL MEDIA: UAlbany Facebook- UAlbany Instagram- UAlbany Twitter- UAlbany Blog-
MEDIA: Albany Student Press- America East TV- ESPN3- Schenectady Gazette- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio- The Team 104.5 ESPN Radio Archive interviews- Times Union College Sports- Times Union Sports- WCDB- WOFX 980-
FALL SPORTS LINKS: CAA Football-
WINTER SPORTS LINKS: College Insider- Pomeroy Ratings- Real TimeRPI-
SPRING SPORTS LINKS: Inside Lacrosse- Lax Power Backup Stick-
OTHER FORUMS: America East Forum- Any Given Saturday Forum- Championship Subdivision forum(1-AA Discussion) The Hen House - Siena Forum- Stony Brook Forum- Vermont Forum

Recommended Posts

Thought I would start a separate thread since there may be many storylines coming in the next few days and weeks on his status.

Looks like many here are not that concerned if he stays or goes, his play is detrimental to the flow of the offense, his attitude and possible "diva" mentality hurts the locker room, or maybe lack of commitment to academics that Marr needed to address.  Could also be some reoccurance related to his semester break last Fall are an issue for which the young man should seek help for.  

Big difference not playing due to being banged up vs "internal matter" .  Will Marr address it tomorrow morning with Rodger? May not if still going on.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is at the point where he is a detriment play without him.  May not have a choice.  We played WELL without him.  Def. let the team down yesterday.  BUT they are ranked #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dslyank said:

So, it maybe/is mute;  but do we win yesterday's game with Tehoka in the line-up. He had to be worth a goal or two or three???????????????

Maybe, but he also causes turn-overs by holding the ball too long and getting doubled and tripled and then losing it or making a bad pass.   I think we have to get use to the idea he will not be playing. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think there would have been an advantage with him in there. It’s not a situation where you can do some kind of static analysis. If he was quick to hit open guys when the double teams came then maybe a positive. The UA scout has to be to double team and rough him up. Hope for a cheap foul. Offense wasn’t our problem. Defense was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GreatDanes06 said:

wow...garbage NCAA rule. If that was the reason then I take back what I said in previous thread.

THAT is total BS, tagged a company!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreatDanes06 said:

 

WOW!  I agree with Coach Marr!  Outrageous.  https://dailygazette.com/article/2019/03/04/ualbany-men-s-lacrosse-s-nanticoke-suspended-indefinitely-for-ncaa-violation

Edited by HOF2013
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly now feel horrible that I thought this was all him and off the field issues. Total jump to conclusion. If anything, and I don't want to blame the SID or the AD, the idea UA used term "internal matters" made me go in that direction. However, the idea that this is the issue is utter nonsense. He tagged a string lace company. Come on man!

The national lacrosse media is picking up on the story now:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...